Ranting About Mum, and Peace-Making with C – Week 41

Things were so much improved on Thursday from what they had been the week before.  I think C’s mood and / or attitude was better than it had been, and I was feeling considerably more sane than I have of late, so between the two of us, the whole session felt a lot more productive.  I, in fact, felt respected and – dare I say it – I felt a lot of the warmth from him that I had felt to be characteristic of him before all the bollocks about the cessation of therapy began.

The discussion commenced, perhaps unsurprisingly, with C picking up where we’d left off the previous week with reference to the dodgy Diazepam that I’ve (hopefully) purchased.  Under the caveat that he of course doesn’t approve of the purchase at all, he wanted to talk about ways that I could protect myself from taking the whole dose if I go mental some time, whilst at the same time taking responsibility for their ownership and the fact that I made the decision to buy them.

Writing it back now, it sounds very DBT-ish, but at the time it didn’t seem particularly condescending; if anything, I felt that he gave enough of a toss that he didn’t want me to do myself in (that it wasn’t just about covering his arse), but that simultaneously he didn’t want to patronise me by telling me I had to bin them all or give them all away.

A discussion ensued about putting a few of them in my care, and giving guardianship of the rest of them to A.  As long as I have access to some of them at any given time, I honestly don’t give a toss about someone else having them, but C didn’t seem to really think that all of me was content with it.  I admitted that because I was in a relatively stable frame of mind that I couldn’t see what other ‘parts’ of me might think, but I did concede that I have a rebellious streak that may manifest at some point and take offence at not being allowed to have all of the tablets in my possession.

C said, “what would you say to that side to persuade her that this is a sensible course of action?”

“Nothing,” I replied.  “I’d just tell her to fuck off.”

He laughed, and said that he didn’t think the rebellious streak would feel particularly validated or disciplined by that.  I nodded, accepting that such a confrontational stance may only wind ‘her’ up further, and make her more determined to claim ownership of the Valium.

The conversation advanced in an unexpected way.  C said, “Imagine I’m you and you’re the therapist, trying to persuade me that putting the Dizaepam in someone else’s temporary care is a good idea.  What would you say?”

“Well, I’d probably say something like…”

“No no no,” he interrupted.  “I don’t want you to just tell me what you’d say…I want you to actually say it, as if you’re me.”

“Like a role-play?” I checked, aghast.

He nodded.

I didn’t really fancy this idea, but I took a deep breath and decided to play along.

I don’t remember what I said, but I got to the point where C – as ‘me’ – was about to reply, when I bottled it.

“OK, C, sorry – this is just too weird,” I interjected, waving my hands embarrassedly.

He smiled and said that he had no wish to make me uncomfortable, but after dithering a bit he asked if I would be willing to try the exercise again.  I heard myself agreeing to this.

He started.

C:  They’re my tablets, I’ll do what I want with them.

SI: But I’m not proposing that you get rid of them entirely, just that you take some of them out of your hands for a bit.

C:  [waving hand dismissively] Nah.  Why should I?

SI:  Because it’s for your own good.  [wincing] Think of it like this – it’s kind of like the tablets are under lock and key, as they would be in a pharmacy or something.  You don’t have immeadiate access to the key, but access becomes yours as your own small stash depletes.

C:  [pauses, apparently ruminating on what I said]  OK, so what you’re saying is this stuff is still mine, but access to it can only be granted in bursts.

SI: [incredulous] Obviously, yes…

C:  But why shouldn’t I just take them all anyway?  I hate my life.

SI: I can’t let you do that…it would be unprofessional…

C:  Why can’t you?  You don’t care about me!

SI: No, but I have a professional responsibility to stop you.

He laughed at my “no, I don’t care about you,” and signaled that we could desist from continuing in this vein.  He said, “I really liked your lock and key analogy, that was very good.”

I was astonished.  “That was patronising bollocks,” I declared.

“I don’t think it was.  Parts of you may think so, but I also think it’s a simple but effective way of communicating to those ‘rebellious’ parts that they are being protected whilst at the same time being afforded some responsibility.”

He paused for a moment, then continued by saying, “I know you have that book on schema therapy in BPD.  Do you recall that, according to it, there’s a detached protector, and several child parts?”

I nodded.

“Perhaps the detached protector, the healthy adult even – they may find something like what you’ve just said ‘patronising’ – but don’t you think it’s really the angry or frightened children that most need to be protected?  And if so, then this is clear, effective language that they can understand.”

I fought the urge to protest that I had been a precocious child.  I had been, and these ‘child parts’ still are, but even I wouldn’t have been able to come up with a decent immediate comeback to my stupid ‘lock and key’ analogy.

I finally said that I would keep 25 of the tablets and give the remaining lot to A, to act as my dispensing pharmacist as and when the 25 were depleted.  C furrowed his brow.

“What strength are the tablets?” he asked.

“10mg each.”

He winced, causing me to protest that 25 of the things couldn’t kill you.  “One gram, the whole lot, wouldn’t kill you unless you were very (un)lucky.  I’ve researched this.”  (My research consists of reading a pro-choice suicide newsgroup, a seemingly dubious source, but actually, the members thereof are very well informed.)

He continued to look concerned.  “I know you’re well informed about this, but do these types of medications not slow the heart rate?  Surely ‘even’ 250mg could induce heart failure?”

I don’t think so, but I was not against the idea of meeting him half way, so I advised that if it would ease his mind, I would retain ownership of only ten tablets.

He was unhappy with that too, of course, believing that I believed that he had invalidated my sense of responsibility and coerced me into retaining the lower amount.

“Look, C, it’s fine.  Honestly.  I am not displeased with the idea of only keeping 10 of them.  I don’t use them frequently anyway, and even as I do, I have no doubt that A will give me the next ten when necessary.  I don’t feel treated like a kid or anything like that.  Really.”

The entire discussion may be moot anyway, since the bastarding things have not arrived yet.  C did acknowledge the possibility, as do I, that the whole transaction might be a scam.  I hope not though, because my GP’s surgery is being difficult regarding the prescription of Valium, which is the only thing that calms me down in certain circumstances.

This led C to talk about his silly breathing exercises.  I told him that I didn’t think they were totally useless, but stole a quote from W, and said that they were akin to throwing a bottle of water on a massive Australian bush fire – ie, something that may help in a minuscule way which is totally inadquate.

To my surprise, C’s first reaction was to say that he saw my point; however, he then went on that even if that bottle of water is totally inadequate at putting out the entire fire, it might enable a little bit of the fire to dissapate, in turn enabling further work to be done to put out the rest of the fire.

I hadn’t thought of it like that, although I’m smart enough that I probably should have done.  I do genuinely think that the breathing exercises in and of themselves are mostly wank, especially when one is going really mental.  Nevertheless, for mild anxiety attacks, I suppose they have something of a place before taking actual, tangible measures of self-protection, such as removing yourself from the anxious situation.

There was a lull in the discussion then, a contemplative silence which I eventually broke by admitting to C that I had found the last few weeks in therapy really challenging and frustrating.  I told him that I had found him defensive and un-empathetic, though I acknowledged openly that I hadn’t been much use myself.

I don’t recall his phraseology, but he admitted to his defensiveness, though carefully suggested that it was a mutual thing.  I agreed and said things in my world had been really difficult since Christmas / New Year, so he had gotten to see me at my most mental.

I lamented this further by saying that I wished I had been referred to the psychiatrist before seeing him, as I felt that becoming more stable thanks to medication could have helped me to use therapy in a more productive manner.

He reflected on this, and for the first time in the whole year or so that I’ve known him made (an admittedly oblique) reference to the fact that he sees more people in his line of work than just me.  “I think you’ve made an important point,” he told me, “and in future I’ll consider that, maybe telling GPs that in some cases psychiatric referrals would be better in the first instance than referrals to me.  However, here we are – I hope we have nevertheless been and will be able to do something valuable together.”

I nodded, and told him that just because I felt the referrals were the wrong way round did not mean that I believed our relationship had been valueless.

“And if you’re thinking of the frustrations of last week,” he continued, “I think our discussion hitherto has followed on from that – to that end I don’t think it was actually a wasted session at all.”

I suppose, horrible as it had been, that it had indeed provided some impetus for this session.  Furthermore, as I told him, it is probably a good thing that he sees me in all my moods, even the most mental thereof.

Another brief lull ensued.  Eventually C reminded me that we had, a few weeks ago, discussed the fact that I was reading a self-help book.  He asked how I was getting on with it.

I said that I hadn’t finished it (read: haven’t read any more), but gave him a brief overview of it.  “There’s plenty of wank in it, but the parts that it does well, it does very well.”

He asked again what it was called and I said that its name was Getting Through the Day: Strategies for Adults Hurt as Children.

“Obviously it’s designed for victims of real abuse,” I mused, “but I can make it apply to myself in some ways.”

I regretted these thoughtless words as soon as they were out of my mouth.  At least, I did at a visceral level; I didn’t want him to defend me on the grounds that my ‘abuse’ was real.  Not only would that mean facing that stuff, it would mean having to confront my default position that it was of my own doing.  Intellectually, of course, I know this needs to be addressed.

C said, “you don’t think your abuse was real?  But there was sexual abuse by…”

This was the first and only thing that annoyed me in this session.  He said, “…there was sexual abuse by your…grandfather?  Uncle?”

So you remember that I have the book on fucking schema therapy but you don’t remember the identity of my rapist?  Thanks C.  Thanks very fucking much.

I confirmed that it was the latter.

He asked me how I felt about going into greater detail about this subject over future weeks.  I told him that to say I wanted to do so would be absolutely untrue, but I did say that I believed it was a possible necessity.

He said that it isn’t always necessary to explore such matters down to their very minutiae, the implication being that the memories in some people’s minds are not always unprocessed and unresolved.  “But,” he went on, “I think your instinct is that this is something important, and to that end we probably should look at it more.”

I winced.  I don’t want to do that.  The images haunt my consciousness on a fairly frequent basis as it is.  Detailing it with him, actually going into specifics, is bound to make that worse, even though the idea is to make the memories less vivid and cumbersome in the long-term.  But I’m not stupid; I know I shoudn’t avoid it, much as the temptation to do so is strong.  I told C that I wanted to go ahead with it.

So that is something that will presumably come up tomorrow, especially in light of my little outburst of self-blaming sluttery at the weekend.

I’m not sure to what extent I have conveyed it by detailing the dialogue, but I did get a sense of respect and care from C in this session, something that I had desperately needed from him in the last few weeks.  On the other side of the coin, I did not, for once, enter the session in a confrontational frame of mind, but instead was also extending an olive branch of respect and, insofar as it is possible in the therapeutic sense, friendship.  Our mutual stances paid dividends, I think, and I can only hope that that will continue.

I drove back to my mother’s, as I usually do after seeing C, to find a cross-generational gaggle of McFs (MMcF, Sarah, Suzanne and Marcus) inhabiting the living room.  Occasionally they come to see my mother during the week, as Suzanne (the only driver amongst the females of that dynasty) only works three days a week, and in any case is now on maternity leave as her second kid’s birth is due to take place in the next few weeks.  I am never glad to see them, of course, but I prefer these occasions much more than having to end up in their house, bored out of my fucking skull and having to rely on Paedo of all people for some slightly-better-than-completely-desultory conversation.

Anyway, the interaction went as non-shitly as these things tend to do – for a while.  Eventually one of the McFs brought up the fact that their neighbour is regularly leaving his insolent five year old daughter at the McF’s house, whilst he fucks off to the pub or the gym or something.  Apparently Paedo keeps acquiescing to this, then dumps the kid on Sarah, MrsCMcF or whatever human of the female persuasion happens to be about that day.  Which I suppose is a good thing because it means he’s not fucking raping the child.

Apparently on one day that this happened the wee girl had disobeyed the McFs and went to one of the bedrooms and started jumping on the bed.  S was concerned not just for the child’s welfare had she fallen, but for that of the McFs.  She claims that social services have been involved in the child’s life at times, and was worried that if the girl had fallen and sustained injuries, that the McFs would be assumed to be beating her up or something and get done.

It was my mother that said it.  My mother, who knows – or has chosen not to know – about my history with Paedo.  Fucking bitch.  She said, “you’ll have to stop this practice [the girl coming round to be babysat] altogether.  As well as her hurting herself, what if she starts making stories up about Paedo…you know…?”  I am convinced she shot a sideways glance at me as she said this.  She did not need to complete her sentence to be understood.

Suzanne nodded.  “And mud sticks,” she sighed.

Oh fucking does it really.  Apparently not with my mother.  I told her he raped me.  I told her he regularly touched me in inappropriate ways.  I told her, and she refused to believe me.  So actually yeah, maybe the mud does stick – but it sticks in the sense that she still believes I’m a malicious fucking liar.

Who lies about being sexually abused as a child?!  Who does that?  How fucking dare she not only not believe me and accuse me of lying, but then make unsubtle digs showing me that she hasn’t forgotten my alleged ‘lies’?  How.  Dare.  She?!!!

Yesterday she dragged me to the other aunt still residing in Northern Ireland, the Aunt of Boredom, Maureen.  I was zombified by anti-psychotics, and even if I hadn’t been, the conversation centred around whether or not you should have a fence or a hedge at the perimeter of your property, and thus was insurmountably boring.  After lunch, Maureen was heard to say to my mother than I was being very quiet.  Well, I wonder why that might be, Auntie Dearest.  It is because I couldn’t give a sideways fuck about fences or hedges.  However, my mother was then heard to respond not by saying that I was bored, but instead that she was “very worried” about me.  The two old biddies subsequently closed the kitchen door and started discussing my mentalism in hushed tones.  And then Maureen was allowed to cross-examine me on the finer points of my madness.  I felt like somebody’s lab rat.

Can I just say that my mother’s behaviour of late has been un-fucking-acceptable.  Since before my BPD diagnosis in June, I’ve done a lot of reading on the possible causes of the illness.  I now believe that it was not just the abandonment of me by my father nor the sex abuse that brought the hibernating insanity out in me.  It was, surely, my mother’s frequent invalidation of me too, not to mention some of the borderline-abusive behaviour to which she subjected me during my teens.  She too has obviously been traumatised, in her case by her relationship with my father (as C has recognised).  It seems to me that that has led to difficulty in her interactions with me.  Or so says SI the armchair psychologist.

No parents are perfect, and we are probably all mental in our own idiosyncratic ways.  My mother is a good and decent woman who has had a horrible life.  But I still deserve better than this from her.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Ranting About Mum, and Peace-Making with C – Week 41

  1. Pingback: Pandora

  2. Pingback: Pandora

  3. I have to admit I’d be fucking fuming with your mother too if these things had happened to me. To invalidate you like that is horrible and to talk about you with your aunt requires much slapping. I can understand your need to question her part in the general mentalness that is. Families fucking suck.

    I’m glad things with C were a bit better this week, I hope they continue like that. It sounds like you’ve got some really difficult work coming up so big hugs xxxx

    • Thanks babes. Thursday was, insofar as it’s possible, a ‘good’ session too, so fingers crossed.

      Thinking of you – I know you’re going through a horrendous time at the minute, and my whinging about not very much really seems pathetic in comparison. Mega hugs xxxxx

  4. Unfortuantely parents carrying on like this is all too common. My parents insisted for years I was making up the abuse heaped on me by my teacher. And even when a consultant psychiatrist told them that in his opinion I was telling the truth and he wanted me to go to the police and have the perpetrator prosecuted and offered his services as an expert witness, they refused, and actually said they would testify against me.

    • That’s appalling, DeeDee. It’s horrific that these things happened to you in the first place, but to have salt rubbed in the wound like that by your own parents is shocking. I agree with you – it does seem to be more common that some might like to believe. At the end of the day, if our own parents don’t trust us enough to believe us about serious matters like these, who will?

  5. First, thanks for visitng my blog.
    Second, I know all too well, the feeling of invalidation, my mother is still in denial. I’ve accepted it, but it still hurts that she can’t believe her own daughter, but believed her brother (thankfully just died!)
    My therapist is always asking for my pills, I tell him I need them as my security blanket.
    jo

    • Again, horrible. That must have been so difficult to deal with on top of the issues you were coping with re: the abuse. I applaud how you’re trying to help others who’ve been through similar experiences; what strength that demonstrates.

  6. Goodness DeeDee – that is awful!

    SI, some of this post did make me giggle, especially the roleplay bit! I think you did so well to give it a go, I bloody HATE roleplay (which you would think would be fine for me – I am a bloody actress afterall!) and would probably have refused, and certainly wouldn’t have given it as good a go as you did. I wonder if he will save up your lock and key analogy to use with other patients in the future. The fence vs hedge debate also made me laugh – what a fucking inane conversation!

    When I was reading in this about your mum I was actually thinking that the way she invalidates your experiences and feelings probably has a fair bit to do with your BPD – there are links between those things anyway, and when it is around such painful experiences as you have had it must be quite horrific, and really add to the trauma.

    xxx

    • The role-play was so weird! I think C found it insightful, because to me it seems obvious that it was an exercise in transference investigation, certainly towards the end of it anyway. I really wish if he wanted to do that he’d just come out and say, “how do you feel about me?” or something.

      You’re right that Mum’s attitude adds to the trauma considerably. In fact, sometimes I wonder if her refusal to accept the truth is worse than the abuse itself. My uncle and I don’t care much for each other, and he’s only an uncle by marriage anyway. But my mother and I do care about each other, and as my primary care-giver and supposedly unconditional lover, she of all people should be exhibiting more understanding and less cynicism than this.

      Take care hun xxx

  7. The last paragraph and final sentence seem to me, as an outsider, a very reasonable explanation – what mental health workers of course call ‘insight’. Most of the time it is all that you can get from a talking therapy, and insight alone doesn’t change anything. It may allow you to forgive yourself or others, it may not – but that’s about it. New meanings don’t lead you to act differently. Our actions change when we find ourselves, either by accident, or because someone else has taken us by the hand, in a new situation or environment. We are forced to adapt, act differently and as a result a whole new set of feelings and thoughts about ourselves and others arise. The new situation is scary but we act ‘as if’ we have a competency which we don’t yet feel.

    Well that’s what more than 20 years in the system led me me to conclude anyway.

    Best Nick (I’m going have to think of a name to call you, SI doesn’t quite say it!)

    • I do think you’re probably right in many ways here, Nick. I swing between having faith in psychotherapy as a vehicle for recovery, to thinking it’s absolutely useless. In theory, it makes no real sense that simply talking about things can change how you feel, but I suppose I have always sought the fabled insight into why I’ve experienced the distress I have.

      I suppose one thing that I hope can come out of the process is to rebuild the confidence I’ve lost. I think insight can help develop that, but alone it is hardly enough I know.

      I’ll have to think of an alternative pseudonym myself actually; I’m sure you’re not the only one that struggles with the SI moniker! Perhaps one of the names I use in role-playing 😉

  8. Pingback: Pandora

  9. I just wanted to say that I accidentally stumbled across your blog this week and it is absolutely amazing. You are smart, astonishingly funny, and terrifyingly articulate (and sometimes just plain terrifying). I think you should turn this into a book. I work as an editor and I can’t say how impressed I am with the rendering of humour, dialogue and voice in these entries. Whatever comes next, think about publishing this; your dryness, self-deprecation and brutal truthfulness are fucking fantastic.

    • I really don’t know what to say. Your generosity has had the rare effect of silencing me, Alice! Thank you so very, very much; I truly appreciate your kind words.

      I would love to publish my work – I’ve always considered writing professionally, and in particular if this blog could raise awareness of BPD and other mental health conditions, whilst at the same time being entertaining, I think it would be a very worthwhile pursuit. I have a few logistical concerns and wouldn’t know where to start, but I’m sure these issues could be assuaged with a bit of work and research.

      Anyhow, once again, thank you. I feel very, very chuffed 😀

      All the best to you – please come back sometime!

      x

  10. I think you are HUGELY brave to have got this far as to write about your abuse. I thought the first time I read your blog that it would be highly publishable in book form as it is SO brilliantly written and that it would not only be a great education to those who are oblivious to the horrors of abuse and the gruelling therapy that suffers/victims participate in , to try and come to terms with this MASSIVE trauma,inflicted by evil/dare I say sick?? predators. And a great help to the victims..I think it would be great to publish it so that it reaches out to a far wider “audience” for want of a better word!! It would be a massive help to others who are feeling isolated by their similar terrible experiences.
    You are a truly gifted writer/person who is in the position to gain something positive from such a shocking ordeal that you have endured. CVM xx GO girl GO!! xxx

    • Well, I’m not sure I’d go that far C, but thank you nevertheless 🙂 My experiences of sexual abuse aren’t as serious as some, and I have a penchant for defence of Paedo, but still at the end of the day, if it did educate anyone as to the logistics of everything then I suppose it would be a good thing.

      Take care x

  11. that must hurt so much to haveactually gone through telling her to have it disregarded.
    This terrifys me about telling my owh mother what has happened to me, especially as shes gone through so much of her own trauma with my abuser (my bastard dad).
    I hope she accepts it one day and lets him know it.
    x x x

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s