Sep 262009
 

Things are, indeed, bad.  I seem to have got myself a stalker.  Did I write here that a few weeks ago whilst manic I went up to some bloke in the pub and started talking to him?  Well, if I didn’t chronicle it, then there you go.

A was with me, and it was all totally innocent – the man in question is a grey-haired biker git, 20 years my senior.  Not that age matters a fuck to me, but really – there was nothing sexual or romantic about this liaison in any way.  He seemed fairly genuine too, and the three of us got on well, with shared interest in music and whatnot.

Unfortunately, I shortly realised my mistake and tried to get away; I’d nothing against having a pint with this man, but I didn’t want to spend all night with him.  But it wasn’t that simple, and to my horror I found myself agreeing to exchange phone numbers with him.

He harassed me on and off a few times but whilst it was bothersome, as I despise the fucking phone, it was little more than a nuisance.  However, just before we went on holiday, he rang me and was on the bloody phone for about an hour.  Towards the end of the conversation, he made a number of sexual comments that I don’t want to even think about.  I listened in horror, unable to hang up, though I eventually managed to ‘politely’ get away.

In consequence of this conversation, I have ignored the little contact he has recently directed at me.  He seemed to have got the message.

So, A and I went to the local after dinner last night.  We scouted it out for Blokey Bloke, and he wasn’t there, so we sat down and began to engage in conversation.  After about 20 minutes, though, to my horror, I saw Fuckhead cross the path of my peripheral vision.  I pretended not to notice him at first, but he’d clearly seen us and basically pushed me out of the way to sit down with us.

I wouldn’t say that A and I encouraged the conversation particularly, but what we didn’t do was tell the miserable son of a bitch to fuck the fuck off.  No, we both chickened out.  Pathetic, miserable wusses.  Me especially, as it was my fucking irresponsibility that had got me into the damn mess in the first place.

We pretended that we had only intended to come in for one drink and promptly left, and went to the other pub in the vicinity.  But by then I was so freaked out I kept seeing yer man.  He was there, in the bar – yet he wasn’t.  Then the bloody voice started wittering on.  Then I really lost it and was crying and panicking and begging A to protect me from everything and my skull was splitting and frankly, had A been a psychiatrist I think I’d have been sent to the bin right then and there.

Perhaps needless to say, A took me home.  I think I was able to feign having calmed down to some extent, but when he fell asleep I tried to sever the arteries in my ankles.  I momentarily tried my wrists too, but decided against that as the blood would be much more visible to me, what with one’s hands being much closer to one’s eyes.  I do like watching the blood from cutting, but I understand that severed wrists when done properly are actually pretty gruesome; you can see much more than just blood.  So I abandoned that.

As you can see, this pathetic suicide attempt failed.  The agony of trying to slit my ankles was indescribable, and the cuts that are there are little more superficial than any non-suicidal self-harm cuts.

I bandaged my feet and went to bed and did sleep briefly, but only for a couple of hours.  I woke at maybe 2am and have essentially been awake since.  The cat threw up on the landing and I used the bandages of my by-that-point dry wounds to clear up the vomit – how strange and surreal.

Today I can feel a migraine coming on, and I feel guilty about the cuts because I know it’s not fair to put A through this crap, and I’ve got to see the in-laws tonight (not that that’s a bad thing, however).  I’m also aware that I can hardly ever go for a quiet drink again without whatshisface harassing me, as he frequents both our locals.  I suck so utterly profoundly.  How irresponsible and stupid!  So, life could be better.

A wants me to tell VCB about last night but I think she needs to hear the redacted version.  I really don’t think being binned would help my fragile mental health; psychiatric wards sound like places of great evil to me (group therapy?  Fuck off.  Other mentals wanting to talk to you?  Fuck off.  NHS neglect, food and general wastage?  Fuck off).  I am seeing VCB on Tuesday and am terrified, then on Thursday I’ve got to go to occupational shitting health.  So another great week awaits.

Sorry for whinging.

Sep 242009
 

As you know, I’ve been on holiday, and as you also know, I promised I would go into more detail about the three mental health appointments I had in the days that preceded my departure. I had started this post well before going to Turkey, but despite my claim that I’d finish it on the plane, of course I didn’t; even flight-safe phones such as the iPhone were not allowed to be used onboard. Obviously in Turkey I was trying to enjoy myself, though as you will see in a later post that did indeed involve some forays into psychiatry. Anyway, I’ve finally got round to the post in question, so here it is.

Tuesday: The Psychiatrist

I said I’d go into more detail about how I responded to the psychiatric SHO on Tuesday 8th. Basically, I said I couldn’t deal things any more (I’m sick of my up-down moods and am worried about the effect some of my psychoses are having not just on me but the others around me). I said I’d been pushed from pillar to post by Dr C’s department – due to the ridiculous saga to be seen by them in the first place, then their cancelling an important appointment in July – and that I thought it was unacceptable.

The thing was, I was in a complete state and it sounded more than I was pleading with her than that I was angry with her. I was begging, effectively. My first reaction to her refusal to do anything was one of panicked desperation, and I half broke down, but she merely apologised and said she was too inexperienced to deal with a case like mine. She blamed the department’s failure to have me sitting there with Dr C on a “secretarial error”.

She said, “if you need help in the meantime, you can always get the Crisis Team to…”

Regular readers will know what I think of the CRT. See about three-quarters of the way down here, for example. So you can imagine my response.

“No,” I shrieked. “No, I can’t – they’re useless, they’re crap!”

“Well, they’re always there for you,” she started, but she seemed to realise the futility of continuing in this vein, so she changed tactics and continued by saying, “or your GP.”

She said, “Dr C will talk to your psychologist right away and see you as soon as possible – unfortunately she’s just doesn’t have a window today.”

Seems to be her curtains are always fucking pulled, but anyway – I told Dr A I would be on holiday until 21st September inclusive, so she agreed to organise a new appointment for sometime after the 22nd. I got up then, mumbled some sort of goodbye, and almost literally stumbled out of the building. Some other (male) mental sitting near the door tried to grope me on my way out (the “appointment” was in the psychiatric day hospital, rather than the usual outpatients clinic, so obviously he was ((erroneously?)) recently released from the actual bin).

As I was telling C the following Thursday, another thing of note was the physical environment of the “appointment”. As stated it was in the day hospital, which has much smaller one-to-one consultation rooms than outpatients. This was a problem as there was a window in the door, and I could see the other mentals looking in from time to time. Even worse than this was the fact that the room was near the entrance, meaning that all the others waiting for their cunty day therapy and other patronising OT-esque wank were directly outside the room smoking. Not a problem in itself – except that Dr A neglected to close the window, meaning that everyone else could hear the conversation.

I could have (reluctantly) lived with all of this imbecility if they had done something, but obviously they didn’t.

So anyhow, I went and sat in my car. Recognising that I was unfit to drive, I decided to ring A for cathartic discussion. I cried down the phone to him for about 20 minutes. He was absolutely livid with Dr C and her people. He authoritatively told me not to drive until I’d calmed down considerably, but said when I got back to my mother’s house that I should get her to phone them and kick up a fuss and demand answers – not to mention an actual definite date to see Dr C.

After a while I thought I’d calmed down and left, but I remember bawling my eyes out at times on the way home and practically fell through the door to my mother’s. Initially I was incapable of even rudimentary speech, but eventually I managed to convey a basic version of Dr C’s neglect to my mother.

My mother tried to calm me and I suppose she partially succeeded, because she managed to eventually tear herself away from me for long enough to phone Dr C’s admin department (a suggestion unsolicited by me), who emphatically denied a “secretarial error” but did say they would try and find out what had happened. Apparently the girl Mum spoke to was very nice and she said she would phone back with information later.

Then Mum contacted the GP; the one on call was the (only) one I hate in the ‘surgery’ (I’m indifferent to the others, mostly), because on more than one occasion she has blamed my mental health issues on being overweight. Sure, luv; wouldn’t be anything to do with personal pathology, rape, abandonment, bullying, lies or bereavement. Obviously not. As it happens, I think a lot of my excess weight is caused by depression rather than the other way about; partly because of comfort eating, partly as an annoying side effect of antidepressants. But that’s another issue.

Anyway, let’s call this woman Horrible GP, in contrast to her colleague, Lovely GP, with whom I was due to have a review appointment the next day. My ma outlined the issues involved and Horrible GP asked to speak to me. I refused, but she pushed my mother to get me to talk and thus I started to go mental, screaming that there was no way in hell that I was going to pick up the phone.

Mum said to HGP, “she’s panicking now.”

Query: is “going mental” the same as having a panic attack? I’ve certainly had the latter; for me, a panic attack is much more of a physical problem. Not that that doesn’t affect one mentally, of course, but going mental is almost a reverse course of action. It’s the shit in my mind, racing around in a whirlpool splitting my skull, that causes physical distress, rather than the other way about.

Whatever the case, the long and the short of it was that HGP agreed to provide emergency Valium, as I had left my main stash from my last meeting with LGP at A’s house, on the other side of town.

This agreed, Mum sat down with me again and ranted about Dr C and her negligent behaviour and about how she was thinking of going to the media. About this time, A sent me a text message saying that he was “so angry with these abject cunts” and also suggesting contacting a popular local consumer affairs programme.

Handbags at dawn, dearest readers!

Mum eventually went to get the Diazepam from the pharmacy, at which point I inflicted the self-harm that I posted a photo of, perhaps irresponsibly, here. It’s no big deal, self-mutilation is not uncommon for me as many of you know. It helps. I did it as I perceived the situation as Dr C hating me. Therefore, I was a hateful person. Therefore, that had to be acknowledged somewhere. That’s a logical(-ish) train of thought that wasn’t exactly present at the time, but it was at least the sense of my reasoning.

I bled and bled and bled and then worried that I wouldn’t be able to try and hide the injury from Mum, who has been mostly unaware of my cutting. I managed to bandage myself up, though, and the bleeding was adequately hidden just in time for her return.

I took the Diazepam, and the rest of the day was mostly uneventful. A was good enough to go back to our house, feed the cats and get my tablets, then come and stay with me at Mum’s (I wasn’t allowed to drive due to the Valium). He and Mum spent some time scathing about the morning’s occurrence, and the words “criminal negligence” were used. My mother queried what would actually happen if someone were seriously suicidal, little knowing of course that a few weeks ago, I tried to hang myself. Mind you, I hadn’t told Dr A that either. To be perfectly honest, I didn’t tell her because I had forgotten that I’d tried to hang myself. Who forgets trying to hang themselves?! It’s a good thing I did, though, as there’s always the possibility they’d have sectioned me. I am, after all, a danger to myself at times.

Wednesday: The General Practitioner

The next day I had a very long discussion with LGP (his colleague having related the previous day’s fun and games to him). Appointments are meant to be 10 minutes long, so if you’re the poor sod that was waiting at least 15 minutes after your appointment time, then I apologise. At least it shows LGP cares about his patients, unlike others I can fucking think of.

LGP asked to see the self-harm of the previous day, so I showed him, and in fact gave him the guided tour of the words and slashes that litter the flabby rolls of my abdomen. He appeared to be genuinely affected by this; not freaking out like normals do over this sort of thing, nor angry, but sorry that I was in the position where cutting seemed my best course of action (which I maintain it often is, to be honest). He wasn’t judgemental nor overly worried – he’s obviously aware this is quite normal in mental illness, certainly in BPD and very definitely for me on and off over the years – but just fucking caring. Just nice, supportive and caring.

He showed me the letter Dr C had sent him re: my diagnoses and medication change. I was interested to observe that whilst she wanked on and on about BPD, she had then said that “a differential diagnosis” was bipolar II. I thought a “differential diagnosis” was a diagnosis based on the elimination of most other illnesses based on symptoms presented? If correct, that would suggest to me that bipolar is considered my primary diagnosis, but contextually the letter presented it – as Dr C had done to me in June – as if BPD was my primary pathology. Her whinging about NICE’s mood stabilisers and anti-psychotics in BPD to both LGP and me would seem to confirm that. Can anyone, therefore, clarify the meaning of “differential diagnosis”?

One thing it did say that was moderately encouraging was that she was not totally against the use of mood stabilisers in future. She didn’t make further mention of anti-psychotics, but with regret I am beginning to wonder if I really should have them. (Incidentally, Maisie’s husband was put on an anti-psychotic a few years ago to combat his very severe paranoia. It changed his life for the better almost instantly. You can take a guess as to what I think about that).

LGP wasn’t happy with Dr C as well he might not be. He believes that additional medication (though he didn’t say which) seems appropriate, and furthermore that the dose of Venlafaxine is very low, despite its dodgy side effects. However, he said that he was in an awkward position. He certainly has knowledge of psychiatric illnesses, but he’s no expert, whereas Dr C (supposedly) is. He virtually said that in an ideal world after her lax approach he’d refer me to an alternative specialist, but after all the trouble we had had getting me to one in the first place, he didn’t really see that as a viable option.

That’s fair enough I suppose, although it didn’t help me much. Regardless, LGP has been the only one out of the three main health professionals with which I deal that has been a constant source of support, rather than frustration, so I’ll forgive his reluctance to interfere with the psychiatrist’s domain. We discussed sleeping pills and he suggested I return to Zopiclone over the holiday at least, as it worked for me before and I wouldn’t have to drive on the holiday (prolonged use of it has affected my vision in the past, though not on every occasion on which I’ve taken it). I remembered that he’d given me an inhaler when I was about 14 to help with panic attacks and asked if, in conjunction with the Valium, this would help me when I start to go mental. LGP agreed to provide this inhaler and as I left, after wishing me an enjoyable holiday, he said that if I hadn’t heard from Dr Cunt within the next few weeks, to phone him and he’d get slabbering.

Thursday: The Clinical Psychologist

So the next day’s measure of insanity was with twatting C. We had agreed to spend most of that day’s session discussing coping methods of mentalism on the holiday, and he reiterated that point at the start of the session.

However, he firstly wanted to discuss a few housekeeping issues. The selfish prick chose to take leave the week I came back from Turkey (ie. what would have been today’s session), rather than taking it the same bloody week that I was away.

Is this annoyance on my part unreasonable? Probably, but sometimes I really wonder if mental health professionals, including C, realise the positions of responsibility, authority and trust in which they are placed by their patients. Anyway, at least he’d given me notice of this unfortunate absence before; I sat seething in silent rage as he then explained that the week after that, he’d be on a training course. This means three missed sessions, as opposed to the original expected one.

Fuck. Fuck. FUUUUUCCCKKK!!! Fuck you, C!!! [As it happens, so far I have hardly missed him at all, but (a) there's still two weeks until the next session so Christ knows what'll happen between now and then, (b) I'm trying to replicate my frustrations from then rather than my feelings now and (c) whether or not I miss him is not the point. The fact that I am essentially entirely devoid of mental health support for nearly an entire month is the fucking point].

So anyway, C asked was there anything I wanted to bring to the table before we discussed preventing and coping with madness whilst on holiday. I decided to refrain from coming right out and asking him directly if he had spoken to Dr C, and instead enigmatically replied, “has anyone spoken to you about me?”

He furrowed his brow a little and said, “not since I spoke to your psychiatrist, Dr…Dr..,” he searched for her name.

I reminded him, and asked when the conversation to which he was referring took place. It was clear he couldn’t remember exactly, and he eventually replied with something vague like, “a few months ago.”

Great work, Dr C. You and your SHO claim you want to speak to C and see me as soon as possible thereafter. Clearly it was right the fuck up there in your list of priorities.

I nodded at C, feigning casual indifference, eventually cracking under the pressure of his piercing stare of curiosity a few minutes later.

“You won’t be aware of the events of Tuesday, then?”

“It was Tuesday you saw her, wasn’t it?” he asked in all sincerity.

I laughed bitterly and made some vicious snipe about how useful “seeing” her was.

I went on to detail the circumstances in full. Those have all already been reported here so I can omit that part of the discussion from this summary of the meeting. Basically, two issues arose.

Firstly and of foremost interest was that C seemed utterly perplexed by the fact that I had cut myself in the wake of his colleague’s fuck up. Well, aside from the fact that’s a fucking hallmark trait of my illness, you twat, I was going totally up the walls and self-harm – as I have told about 496,960 times – is a quick, simple and effective tool to suppress such spiralling insanity.

OK, SI. Why the need for something so elaborate, then. Perception at time: Dr C hates me. I am hateful. That needs to be acknowledged.

Entirely predictably, C droned on for about 40 years on methods of “distraction” and “grounding myself in the moment”, all this bollocks we visit in a circular motion time and time again. I don’t remember my response to him. I just remember my metaphorical eye-rolling and desire that he’d move the fuck on from this DBT nonsense, because in its simplest form anyway, it doesn’t fucking work.

Anyhow, the second issue arising from the Dr C conversation was what he thought of the treatment meted out to me by Psychiatry. He seemed surprised by the strength of the reactions of A, Mum and (obviously) me, and his expressions and body language suggested, to me, something akin to nonchalance about the situation. Well – maybe ‘nonchalance’ is an unfair word. But I certainly did not get a vibe of overt concern like I had from LGP.

So, I set him a challenge. “If I ask you a straight question,” I began, “will you please give me a straight answer?”

This, of course, garnered a slight non-verbal reaction, because it was a strong inference that he often doesn’t answer straight questions. Well, he doesn’t. If he doesn’t like my directness about that on this occasion, that’s just too bloody bad.

“If I can,” he responded.

Ha! What you mean, C, is if you’re willing. Do you think I’m stupid? Can’t you even plan the answer in a straight fashion?!

I asked him if he thought I was being unreasonable in expecting better from the Health Service. I reminded him that I had been fucked about by Psychiatry from January to May, then fucked about again in July after a serious medication change to a seemingly effective but nonetheless insidious, potentially mind-altering, drug, then fucked about again in September. Was that fair? Was it fair, also, that such carelessness was exhibited vis a vis my privacy in my meeting with Dr A? Whilst acknowledging that to some extent the NHS is ‘free’ to use, was it fair that I had worked since I was 16 (insofar as my illnesses permitted) and will hopefully return to and continue to work until my 60s, thus facilitating the salaries of Dr C and her team via national insurance – only to be treated in this fashion? Was any of that actually fair? Was I being unreasonable?

When he didn’t immediately respond, I pointed out that my enquiry was serious. I genuinely wanted to know if something about my fury, and that of Mum and A, was somehow unjustified.

He eventually started wittering on about it being fair to expect certain standards from a service, regardless of what that service is, and certain frustrations were bound to be evident were those standards – or, more accurately, the expectations of standards (my distinction, based however on what I inferred from what he said) – were not met.

Exasperated, I said, “yes or no – do you think my anger is unreasonable?”

He sort of sighed, then said, “you talked about your main GP as being a good doctor, but the on-call one on Tuesday as being someone you strongly dislike. Dr C is, presently, in your mind, a second ‘bad’ doctor. If I answer ‘no’, I am just another ‘good’ doctor, affirming your present mindset. If I say ‘yes’, then I become a ‘bad’ doctor.”

He was obviously accusing me of black and white thinking, which is generally not a particularly unreasonable view for him to take, but nonetheless I resented every syllable of this fuck. Is what he said not profoundly black and white? Can’t he understand that if he can coherently and reasonably defend his position on the matter that I might have some insight, that if he disagrees with me that I might be able to derive some perspective from that? Oh no. Even in someone with an IQ of 148, it’s apparently as simple as a childlike concept of good v bad, with no room for relativism at all. I might have BPD, but I’m not completely colour-blind to shades of grey.

Rather than lose it with him, I tried to rationally explain my reasoning for my views on the GPs, the subject of his comments that had especially irritated me. My views on both have been developed over years. I first met LGP over 12 years ago. I first met HGP maybe six or seven years ago. I just didn’t meet either of them once or twice and form a view of them. My views on them, and on all other GPs and health professionals I’ve met, are based over time. They can change dramatically or quickly, I’ll admit, but not without very good reason.

In general, that is.

He conceded that perhaps there was more to it than good-doctor-bad-doctor, but pressed, “why self-harm though?”

This was irritating, as I’d already outlined my reasons. I sighed and said something like I wasn’t sure we’d ever see eye to eye on this.

He said, “I wouldn’t be sitting here with you if I didn’t believe you had other coping methods.”

Seeing my eyebrows raise, he added, “…or at least if I didn’t believe that you could develop them. What would be the point in that?”

I don’t recall my thinking now, but I looked him straight in the eye with what I think was some sort of oddly demanding expression and asked in a dark monotone, “are you going to leave me then? You’re going to abandon me?”

Poor C. The man was genuinely stunned. Reflecting on it now, so am I. Talk about adding two and two and getting half a million. There was absolutely no tangible link between expressing that he had hope for me and a suggestion he was going to desist from seeing me. None.

“Where did that come from?!” he exclaimed, mystified.

I honestly don’t remember my answer; I am writing this a fortnight later. I must have said one of two things; either I tried to justify my ridiculous belief that C had suggested he was going to ‘dump’ me, or I immediately apologised and submitted to him. Either way, we ended up in the submissive position, with me predictably following my Attack-Defend-Submit pattern. I said that my comments were clearly bullshit, that I was being daft and he should forget it.

“But it’s obviously something you’re bringing to this room,” C pointed out. “Why is that?”

As can be my won’t at times, I began playing psychologist. Interesting that I refuted any suggestion above that I was childlike, because I remember telling C that that’s exactly what I was. When he asked me why I thought this, I sardonically replied that I wasn’t allowed to intellectualise matters so I couldn’t answer his question.

He laughed and said, with a kind of amused defeatism, “go on then.”

Of course, I couldn’t. This was a PhD qualified clinical psychologist I was talking to. I’m a Wikipedia qualified psychologist. (Actually, I’m underselling myself, as I do have some knowledge of the subject, but it is from some time ago and was not even half as in-depth as a full undergraduate degree, nevermind a doctoral one). For the record, I was thinking of attachment and object relations theories and their roles in transference.

Anyway, my paranoid whining led to a monologue from C about ending therapy. Obviously I’m aware it’s not indefinite, it’s not a permanent fixture in neither his nor my life, aren’t I? But he’d like to assure me – again – that it will never just abruptly end. He envisions a minimum of four sessions of preparation before discharge, probably more, blah de blah.

I just sat there and looked at the floor, struggling to not burst into tears like a bloody newborn, struggling not to get down on my knees and beg him not to leave me to try and make some sense of insanity, my past, my future – my entire damn life – alone. I know I sit here and spout bile about the man and slag him off and call him names – but I do like him despite it all, and I need him and see hope with him and I can’t do it without him – not yet anyhow.

I was utterly overwhelmed by how much I don’t want him to abandon me and how inadequate and feeble I felt because of that. How sad and ridiculous that an intelligent woman of 26 wants a man she doesn’t even know to take the place of her missing father, grandfather and, frankly, friends, given that she only has a few close ones. How pathetic that she is vulnerable like a girl 20+ years her junior, and that she wants this unknown figure to scoop her up and take care of her. It’s so wretched that it’s almost kind of darkly amusing.

He interrupted this self-indulgent and piteous stream of consciousness by asking, “how are you feeling now, in this moment?”

I can return to ranting now. I swear to fucking God that I am sick to death of that phrase. He must surely use it as his meditation mantra. Is there some cadence in it that I’ve missed that makes it an attractive thing to say all the time?

I cleared my throat and said I was fine. He looked at my cynically, but decided against pressing the issue, presumably as there was very little time remaining in the session.

“When Dr C contacts me,” he began, “I can tell her nothing if you want. What we discuss here is confidential. Some people might not be at all comfortable with the idea of a discussion about them behind their back. Others may find it helpful. What’s your take on that? What do you want me to tell her?”

“It is weird to think of the two of you discussing me whilst I’m in absentia,” I admitted. “However, I don’t think that makes it unhelpful.”

I shrugged. “Use your discretion, I suppose. Answer her questions, give her any information you feel is relevant.”

He nodded, and I saw him look at the clock, which to my annoyance he’s moved to behind ‘my’ chair so (I presume) that it’s less obvious to the patient when he checks the time. Which it’s not as you can see his eyes shift above your head. And in any case it was pointless to hide it on this occasion, as he said, “we’ve left very little time to talk about your holiday.”

Oh really, I had no idea, I thought we had six hours. To be honest, I was glad. The preceding minutes had been pretty intense for me and I was tired.

We did conduct a quick and fairly basic discussion on coping if I were to go mental in Turkey, but beyond talking about getting A involved in the techniques, there was nothing new in what was discussed. I did talk about the inhaler from LGP and the Valium, but C kept whinging that these were external sources (oh really? I thought I had them sewn into my oesophagus) and that I needed to develop internal responses. To be honest, I just sat there and nodded, not really agreeing, not really even thinking about what he said, because I just wanted to leave. Not a good thing probably, but there you have it.

As I left, he said, “I hope the holiday goes OK.”

I ranted to A about this later. OK? You hope it is OK?! No “have a nice break” or “I hope you have a great time”?

To my surprise, A defended C. A contends that C had to be careful; had he said he hoped it was “great” or whatever, I would have been too cynical to really believe that he meant it, or that I expected it was possible that the trip could be great. I actually don’t agree that that would have been my view, but in fairness I can see why C might have thought that. So I can forgive his lack of enthusiasm to some extent. I suppose.

Friday: The Flight

OK, the title says ‘three’ days and this is a fourth day, but it doesn’t involve professionals attending to my madness, and in any case I’m not going into too much detail. You can probably tell from the style of writing here and here that I was (hypo)manic on Thursday night. This carried on right into Friday.

I suppose there is an argument that I could simply have been excited about going on holiday, but I don’t think that is the case. Forms of mania are, to me (and as far as I know to diagnostic manuals), different from contentment or excitement, in subtle ways at least. I understand that bipolar II in particular often goes undiagnosed because the hypomania therein often presents simply as an especially good mood. Maybe I seemed in an especially good mood on the Friday of that week, and I probably was, but I was also behaving oddly and saying really stupid shit.

I don’t have the best recollection of it, I’ll admit. I do remember sitting at the departure gate at the airport, delayed, babbling incoherently and in a racing fashion to A. I remember dropping my bag and having some sort of hysterical fit of laughter and more racing speech about this ludicrously uninteresting event. People around me were looking at me as if I was mad (which clearly I was). A found it amusing, and I can understand why it might have been to some – but it is also not ‘normal’; certainly, it was not appropriate behaviour for a public place.

And it very certainly, profoundly and completely wasn’t appropriate for a plane, and luckily I had enough cognisance to realise this. So, for the first and to my credit (?) only time from then to now, I took Valium to space me out and slow me down. It worked, to A’s self-proclaimed disappointment, but obviously it is not a long-term solution to episodes of mania.

Thus began our holiday. I will write in more detail about that shortly; it’s a separate issue from most of this post’s material. However, don’t worry; I’m not going to bore you to death by telling you what we did, what we ate etc etc etc – even if you actually know who I am, such things become dull very quickly. Of course, I keep this diary primarily for my own reasons – but more in relation to my mental health, not ‘normal’ stuff, if there even is any of that presently in my life. No, I want to think about how I felt on the holiday, how I behaved – whether there was an overt exhibition of madness thereon, or whether I actually managed to acquit myself well. I hope to write this tomorrow, but if not hopefully early next week.

Meh

When A and I were waiting for the plane, I received a message from my mother stating that a letter had arrived from Psychiatry offering an appointment on Tuesday 15th. LOLOLOLOL. Can’t they get anything right? I clearly told Dr A I would be away until the 21st. Mum rang them for me and whinged some more, pointing out they had not explained the situation as promised to her on the phone on Tuesday. They promptly and without question rearranged the meeting for Tuesday 29th. I am now terrified of it. It’s not great timing either as I have another bloody OH appointment on Thursday 1st October as well, but there’s not much I can do.

So, finally, you’re probably wondering what the reference to ‘genital vinegar’ in the title of this post relates to. It relates to Dr C. In ranting on Twitter, someone responded to me that Dr C was a “vinegar cunted bitch” – or so I thought. It turned out he was actually referring to some bint spreading more “Obama is a Nazi” bollocks in the US, but never mind – the title as one for my psychiatrist stuck.

Obviously there are a lot of ‘C’s in my life anyway. The actual C, CVM, Dr C…I’m sure there are more. Therefore, to avoid confusion and to reflect my current position on Dr C, I shall henceforth refer to her as the Vinegar Cunted Bitch, or VCB. I know I have a terrible penchant for acronyms, and when combined with usage of terms such as ‘BPD’ etc it is bound to get confusing – but I’m not going to start calling C ‘John’ or VCB ‘Dr Alfonso-Smythe-Hetherington VI’ just to anonymise them, so you’ll just have to bear with me. I have to bear with myself, after all.

Bookmark and Share

Sep 082009
 

Saw a new Senior House Officer, Dr A, who listened to how things had been and asked me to explain various specifics. After 20 minutes, she summarised things – missing a lot of points in my view, but I couldn’t be arsed arguing – then went to see Dr C. Dr A said either she or Dr C would come back. Whilst in the waiting room, I saw Dr C calling someone else. As I am scared of her, I was in part pleased she wasn’t going to see me – but I was also outraged that she was abdicating responsibility again.

However, the people she’d be seeing left before anyone came to get me again, so it looked like she might get involved. Alas, Dr A turned up again. After I’d been waiting another half hour.

She said that there had been a “secretarial error” and that Dr C would need to see me, but couldn’t today, how unfortunate, she’d send me out an appointment as soon as possible, things must remain as they are for now, Dr A isn’t experienced enough to deal with a case like mine, Dr C needs to speak to C (um, didn’t you have three months to do that, luv?), must away now SI, we’ll be in touch soon. Byeeeee!

I could go into detail about my response to Dr A, and I will, but for now I think how I feel about the whole thing and how I think they feel about me and indeed how I feel about me is best expressed by a graphic rather than words. It ‘speaks’ louder.

My mother had to phone the GP’s office to get me Valium, as my main ‘stash’ is at A’s. Hey ho, ho fucking hum.


Bookmark and Share

Sep 022009
 

As any of you who have read this blog since I began it in May will know, it has long since been my intention to write about each of the different therapists of one description or another that I’ve seen over the years. The idea was inspired by the same type of post by Introspective at Conversations with my Head, so hat-tip and thanks to you my dear.

It’s now September, so you can see how successful I’ve been to date in getting around to this. But here I am, finally, with all the fascinating (!) details.

Be warned; this is very, very long. I’d suggest you don’t even bother reading it if you wish to remain awake (possibly alive). If you really want to, try it in two parts or be prepared to be sitting at your screen for a while.

I was about 12 or 13 when I began to think that I had mental health problems. With the benefit of that wonderful thing called hindsight, I can see that I might have been a bit batty even as a child – I was a complete narcissist even then, and once tried to amputate my foot. I was an insomniac and experienced nightly hallucinations. I thought it was normal at the time.

But with the onset of adolescence (though not puberty, for I experienced that mostly in its entirety a bit earlier than most), I began to feel increasingly depressed. I felt hopeless, like my life was worthless, that the future was bleak and dark, that everything was utterly futile. Even I had the sense to recognise this as a bit unusual.

The realisation that I was depressed came one day when we were visiting my grandfather in hospital. In the corridor, there was a sign detailing the diagnostic criteria for a depressive episode. I hadn’t had five of the criteria for a few weeks; I’d had them all for several months.

I remember going back and looking at the poster over and over again, in the hope that my mother would notice that there was something on it that was piquing my interest. I never succeeded in that endeavour, but sooner or later she did, somehow, realise that my marked change in behaviour was quite long term, and off she marched me to the GP. Thus commenced about 12 years, to date, of on-off psychotherapy.

The GPs

Not therapists obviously, but it was of course one of my GPs that initially made the diagnosis of clinical depression; I was aged 14 at the time. To be honest, I think they just gave me a diagnosis and medication just to get rid of me. I am still of the view that I was initially seen as an angsty adolescent that they wanted off their hands. Best to give me Prozac, then say toodle-oo. Except it wasn’t so simple. Mum had me up at the practice more times than enough and eventually they sought the involvement of…

The Counselling Bloke

In all honesty, I remember very little of this guy. I don’t remember his name, and I don’t remember the precise point at which I saw him. I remember that he was a counsellor, of course, but I can’t recall whether he felt I needed more specialist help than he could give me, or whether we just closed the meeting and mutually agreed there was no point in continuing the brief alliance. Whatever the case, I’m fairly sure that I only saw him once, and I found the meeting utterly fruitless.

I do remember what he looked like; he was a short, thin, dark haired bloke, and actually reminds me a bit of C. It’s not beyond the realms of possibility that he in fact was C; although I’m not sure of C’s age, I’m guessing he’s in his mid-thirties. That would make this meeting just on the side of possible; he could have been an undergraduate or new graduate gaining some work experience. Perhaps I am creating a phantom memory, but it doesn’t really matter either way. The meeting was still useless.

The Trainee Child Psychiatrist – Anna

I’m not sure how I ended up with Anna, but it could have been one of two ways. Either the Counselling Bloke referred me, realising I needed more help than he could give, or Mum and I went back whining to the GPs and they eventually referred me. I don’t remember, but it doesn’t matter.

According to Anna herself, so my mother says anyhow, people under the age of 18 aren’t allowed to see psychiatrists. This seems ridiculous and unlikely to me, especially given that Anna – by her own admission – was a “medical doctor” (Mum asked her one day if she had a PhD in psychology), so surely the only mental health specialism of medicine is psychiatry?

Anyway. Whatever the case, she was based at a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Unit and I saw her for quite a few months. I liked her, and despite the bizarre situation and the fact that we never really made any headway, she liked me too (more on that in a minute).

I remember few of the specifics of the psychotherapy. I do remember her giving me stupid, patronising little sheets to fill in. You had to complete the end of the sentence, eg. “I secretly…” or “I really hate…” or whatever. Though in thinking about it, this maybe only happened a couple of times.

I think she was trying some sort of cognitive behavioural approach with me, because I remember thinking at the time that whilst she was well intentioned, her methods were unintentionally condescending (even though she herself wasn’t) and I just knew they were never going to work. I did apply myself to the therapy, though, and tried to work with her, but I never let my guard down and was always very careful in what I said to her. She knew I was bright and I think she actually found me quite entertaining; I remember one incident where I had the woman doubled-over laughing (thanks to some scathing remark I’d made about someone that was intended to be amusing, but I hadn’t predicted just how funny she’d find it).

I don’t remember the exact reason that my sessions with Anna came to a close. We must have agreed to have a break, though I don’t remember that happening exactly. All I do remember is that, whilst I hadn’t seen her for a week or two, I was expecting to see her again, when a little card arrived in the post from her, explaining that she’d been offered a new job on the other side of Northern Ireland and would not be able to see me again. The letter was kind, stating that she’d enjoyed working with me and wished me all the best for the future.

I wished her well and fully understood her reasons for moving on. Our therapy hadn’t much worked anyway, but nevertheless here I was left high and dry again.

The Education and Welfare Officer – Elaine

Actually, I’m not sure whether it was Elaine or Lorraine, but I’m going to go with Elaine as it’s quicker to type.

Elaine wasn’t a traditional psychotherapist; she was actually a social worker attached to the local education board, and was involved in my situation as – owing to my mental health problems – I missed a lot of school. Nevertheless, our relationship became one that more closely resembled a therapeutic one; she was more like a counsellor than someone involved to keep tabs on me. I would meet her each week on a Thursday – it was during GCSE Maths which of course was especially gratifying :-)

As is the wont of social workers, especially (though not limited to) those not directly trained in managing mental health issues (or so I’d imagine), Elaine’s discussions with me would centre around practical measures I could take to help myself, rather than an psychoanalytical exploration.

Although she wasn’t much like Anna in her actual therapeutic approach, she was to some extent in her reaction to me: I distinctly got the impression she recognised that I was not being deliberately awkward as some of my teachers believed, and that she believed that I was a bright, not unpleasant kid, with some genuine difficulties. She liked me. I would take her in photographs of events I’d been at the odd time and she’d always compliment me on how well I looked in them. She took me out to lunch a couple of times as well. She was the only one (other than my best friend D) to whom I would show my prolific self-inflicted injuries (which were more than just silly little cuts, but long, occasionally complex words all over my body). I don’t remember whether Anna ever asked to see them or whether I just avoided it with her, but I’m pretty sure she never saw any of it.

I don’t remember, again, the exact reason why this relationship came to a close. I don’t think Elaine left her position; I think it must’ve been something to do with me taking my GCSEs and therefore potentially leaving school, and ergo, her remit. As it happens, despite my previous intentions, in the end I elected to return to school for sixth form, but by the time I got to that stage, things were more (not entirely, but more) settled anyway.

It was during my time with Elaine that I seriously tried to kill myself (the first attempt, a gesture in retrospect, had been about a year beforehand, catalysed by a break-up with a boyfriend). On this occasion, although I decided upon doing it on a whim, it was something I had been thinking about for a long time and I really intended to die. I took a massive overdose of everything I could find in the house – paracetamol, ibroprufen, various prescription medicines of my mother’s, my Prozac etc etc – thinking it would be enough to off me (I know better now, but I genuinely believed it would kill me then).

I am reminded that my time with Anna and Elaine must’ve overlapped, because I now recall Anna coming to see me the next day in hospital, after I’d had my stomach pumped. When I went back to school the next week, Elaine took me out for lunch. I remember asking her why she was rewarding my behaviour; she responded that she didn’t feel that she was ‘rewarding’ it, but she was upset that I had felt so desperate that I’d seriously tried to kill myself, and she wanted to do something to cheer me up. Well, as anyone who’s been there knows, it takes more than skiving off school for lunch – but I appreciated the gesture, as well as the rest of her tenure as my EWO.

It actually pains me to write about Elaine, because it reminds me very acutely of what was probably the bleakest period to date in my life. It was only through thinking about what I was going to write about on this post that so much came flooding back to me; clearly I had compartmentalised much of it (I was whinging about this to bourach here recently). In a way, one could argue that this past year of my life (ie. 2008 – 2009) has been even worse in the sense that I have experienced a lot more than ‘just’ depression, and that would most assuredly be true. But now, at least, I have a support network, and a network that understands this whole mess is not something of my choosing. I very distinctly didn’t have such support when I was 15/16. I had a few friends, yes, but with the best will in the world it was hard for them, not having been there, to understand a disease so often (and often unfairly) solely associated with adults (I’m not even sure they’d understand it then, but anyway). Although she recognised that I was mentally ill, my mother couldn’t fully grasp the enormity of my despair either, and reacted aggressively to my illness at times, although in fairness she did champion me a lot with the GPs/counsellors etc. I was picked on by a couple of teachers too, though in fairness there were a few good ones. All in all, it was a horribly dark period in my life, and rather than discuss the specifics thereof, I think I’ll just leave it be. Maybe another day.

After doing my GCSEs I existed in a relatively sane frame of mind for a while. My dosage of Prozac had been upped, and a lot of the wankers that had made my life so miserable at school had either left or had grown up a bit. Additionally, I was only having to do subjects I liked and was good at for A Level, so things were a lot more settled for a while. Things were far from perfect; I continued to miss a lot of school, and didn’t do as well in my A Levels as I could have done – but things were certainly better in those two years than they had been in the previous five. In fact, it is only through writing the above about Elaine that I am shown how much I wear rose-tinted glasses regarding school. I tend to be quite defensive of the place should anyone slag it off, and when I think back upon my time there in an abstract sense, I am sometimes overcome with fond nostalgia – this is based almost entirely on not absolutely hating those two years of sixth form. Clearly at least part of me blocks out the unbearable misery that were the preceding five years.

But anyway, that obviously didn’t spell the end to the madness…

The First Assessment Woman

I’m not sure when this was. After sitting my GCSEs, the next time I really remember losing it big style was when I was doing my postgraduate course, but I’m fairly sure the First Assessment Woman was earlier than that. Perhaps I had been feeling low for a while in sixth form (or whilst I was an undergraduate) and had yet again been at the GPs’ ‘surgery’; given my history, they might have referred me to the Psychological Therapies people. Who knows. Whatever the case, I went to see this woman at the same hospital in which I now see C and Dr C.

I believe the meeting was intended to assess what the most appropriate psychological treatment would be for me given my history. It was, short of the Crisis Response Team (see below), the most useless and frustrating mental health-related meeting I have ever had. The woman quite openly sneered at me as I tried to relate some very difficult information to her. I think it was because I expressed everything with a distinct absence of emotion and she therefore didn’t think there was actually much wrong with me (or such was my impression, anyway).

When I related a very abstruse outline of the sexual abuse, she decided that that alone must be the entire cause of my problems and gave me the number of the local Nexus Institute. I remember protesting that I didn’t want to phone someone (so clearly the phone phobia has been ongoing for a good while then) but she dismissively said it could be in confidence “if I wished” (thus totally missing the point) or that I could see them in person, if I preferred, and that that was all, I was to run along now. I didn’t have the energy to argue with her and that was that.


I had a major breakdown whilst undertaking my postgraduate degree. I had, at this point, only the dissertation left to write and had finished the taught part of the Masters programme, so took a full-time job which looked to be like a very good opportunity, and which was, unlike my previous and subsequent jobs, directly related to my academic background.

Unfortunately, I had been in a slow, but with hindsight obvious, downward spiral, largely thanks to my own doing. I had been feeling pretty good during my postgraduate year, so cut back on my Prozac without medical approval. DO NOT EVER DO THIS!!! By the time I realised I needed to remain on the dose I’d been at, the spiral had already taken its grip and the return to the full dose didn’t make a difference.

In fairness to myself, it would probably have happened sooner or later anyway, because at no point had I seriously tackled the underlying causes of my mental health difficulties – surely a recipe for disaster. It’s one thing to be aware of what they are, but it’s different to fully face them and be aware of all the subtleties therein. To mitigate their effects, or at least begin to reverse them, in my view I need to do this. Of course it had been my choice to never get into this detail, as I’d already seen a number of different ‘therapists’ by this point and had failed to utilise the opportunities presented. On the other hand, until you’ve been there, it’s impossible to understand how difficult this is, and how skilled a therapist needs to be to get it out of someone with so many defensive walls built around them, like me.

Anyhow, as ever, I digress. The breakdown meant I lasted a sum total of one week in my new job, and eventually had to leave my course with a postgraduate diploma rather than a Masters degree.

I returned to my GP. LGP had joined the practice by this point, but I didn’t see him consistently until more recently; it’s dog eat dog in our practice, and you take who you get unless you’ve planned the appointment for weeks. So I went to another one, who simply told me to “fight against it”. Unsatisfied with this, I went to the practice’s Nurse Practitioner, who prescribed me a new anti-depressant – Mirtazapine (in part because it’s good for insomnia) – and referred me for wanky CBT. I saw ‘wanky’ now, but I was hopeful at the time.

The Second Assessment Woman

She was a CBT Nurse at one of the main bins in Northern Ireland. She was certainly better than the first bint of her ilk (see above), although I disagreed with her ultimate conclusion. I remember that she asked me the one question that every single one of them has consistently asked me: “don’t you have any female friends?”

I said that I didn’t like other women, adding, remembering her gender, that I meant “no offence” to her. (To qualify this a bit, I generally don’t get on well with other women in real life, though I felt more harsh about this at the time than I now do. Online, this isn’t the case at all – most of my online friends are women. I do have one real life female friend at the minute, so maybe I’m making progress! It all goes back to a terrible case of black and white thinking; because many women express emotion, want children and dream of white weddings, stuff I hate, I behave like I think they all do. Rationally of course I don’t think that at all, but then rationality and I are not always the best of friends, regardless of my desires to the contrary).

Anyway, Assessment Woman Two listened to me and, in fairness, seemed non-judgemental and accepting of the fact that there was something wrong. She did seem puzzled by my customary lack of emotion and even apparent amusement at some stuff, but she let it pass. Her conclusion was to refer me for group CBT. I protested vehemently against this – I was terrified of the group thing. The woman said, though, that she felt it would be beneficial in two ways: (1) the waiting list was shorter for group therapy than individual therapy and (2) it would help me confront my fear of group situations face-on. I reluctantly agreed.

The Psychoanalyst – Ian

As the waiting list for even the group CBT was six months, I went back to my GP’s ‘surgery’ and asked for a recommendation for a private therapist in the meantime. The physician I saw that day suggested Ian.

Ian was a very well regarded psychologist who’d even practiced as a forensic psychologist. Without detailing my academic background too much, this appealed to me strongly at an intellectual level and although he charged £70 per hour, I was happy to ‘try’ him.

I liked Ian. In a way, he reminds of me of C, the psychologist I now see; he was qualified to PhD level in his discipline, was clearly intelligent and astute, and seemed to be able to read my mind.

It was he who first suggested to me that my narcissism was an elaborate defence mechanism, built up over the years to disguise inherent and strong self-dislike. I remember arguing, “but I genuinely do think I’m better than some people,” and him responding by saying, “you genuinely think that you think you do, yes.”

We did discuss some of the stuff that effected me as a youngster, but although this was closer to psychoanalysis than any other therapeutic situation in which I’ve been, he was still primarily interested in here-and-now of my psychology. I believe that this was not because he wasn’t intending to explore everything else in more depth, but because if he had an understanding of what was now the case, it would allow him to work backwards. C did something similar, but has a more structured approach.

Again, though, my whole ‘lack of emotion’ thing was pronounced and perhaps he therefore didn’t realise how serious the situation was, or at least was becoming. Furthermore, if I am entirely honest the whole thing was kind of like an extended intellectual discussion between two parties interested in the way people’s minds work. To this end, I don’t feel that it was necessarily a particularly helpful relationship, even if it was an interesting one.

I think Ian could perhaps have helped me had I allowed him to break down more barriers, but then again, just because we liked each other at an intellectual level doesn’t mean that we ‘clicked’ especially; I don’t think we did, and there is increasing evidence suggesting that the dynamic of the therapeutic relationship is what allows the most useful and effective type of work to be done (see here or here, for example).

I went maybe five or six times, approximately every fortnight, though it became progressively less frequent as time went on. Aware that I wasn’t working, Ian suggested that I do some reading and practical things, and suggested I came back in a couple of months to save myself some money. In fairness, he did genuinely seem to want to provide me with a value for money service.

I didn’t go back, but not because I just gave up.

The Hypnotherapist – Edith

Having heard that I was paying out £70 per hour, the McF dynasty decided to get involved, recommending a hypnotherapist that S and her daughter Suzanne had both gone to, finding her effective and more reasonably priced than Ian at £70 for two hours. I must confess that I was cynical, but my mother offered to pay for the treatment so I thought, “what the hell?” My intention was to have it compliment the work with Ian, rather than replace it, and for a short while nearing the end of my contact with Ian, the two did overlap.

Edith was the sweetest, most gentle woman you’re ever likely to meet. She oozed empathy and sympathy and absolutely tried her level best.

For my part, I did open up to her, but still in a pretty detached sort of way. For instance, I remember one discussion in which I was supposedly hypnotised where she was “regressing” me to my childhood. She asked if I could see the little SI in my mind’s eye, and I said that I could. There was a conversation about the kid’s actions, behaviours – I don’t remember it fully, but in any case, despite outward appearances, it became apparent that Child Me was probably not very happy. Big SI was very bad and said that she didn’t care that her mini-me was somehow unhappy. Edith said, “doesn’t she need to play? Shouldn’t she be enjoying these years of her life?”

I can’t remember my exact response, but it was certainly a definitive no. She kept pressing the issue – “but can’t you empathise with that little girl, that innocent child” blah blah blah – but no matter what way she tweaked it, or however she phrased it, I didn’t like Child Me and did not empathise with her. Edith kept trying and trying to instill empathy in my unconscious, but it never worked.

I’ve always wondered if I was completely hypnotised anyway. Whilst I obviously recognise that hypnosis is generally not like you see on the Paul McKenna show or whatever, but that it is rather just a heightened state of relaxation, my experience in Edith’s was distinctly different to both that of S and Suzanne. S in particular had found that her body took on the characteristics of her abusive ex-husband – she spoke in his voice, she lashed out a couple of times and emulated his stature. Suzanne hadn’t quite such an intense experience, but more so than I had, and neither remember much of it, whereas I remember a lot of it quite clearly (and anything I don’t recall is more to do with the passing of time rather than the hypnosis bit, I think).

I’m not faulting Edith; if I wasn’t hypnotised, then it is probably because I resisted it. I don’t know about the accuracy of the claim that some people can’t be hypnotised – maybe that’s part of it? But still, once more, I wasn’t fully willing to confront everything in detail. Again, yes, this is arguably stupid, but I still utterly despised the notion of expressing emotions (I still do) and was incredibly defensive.

One issue of difficulty was that I had to point blank lie about McMF-paedo-fuck to Edith. This is because she lives close to the McFs, and of course she treated Maisie’s husband’s daughter and granddaughter. Although I have more than one uncle that is still alive (and did then too), it would just have been too awkward to admit that it was an uncle. She did directly ask me who was responsible, so had I said, “my uncle,” there was nothing to stop her from asking which one. I therefore had to lie and say it was the husband of a friend of my Mum’s. This meant having to remain on guard about this issue a lot, which no doubt didn’t help the hypnotherapuetic process.

Having said all that, Edith must have done me some good. One thing she did do was set anchors, though as far as I know this is as much about neurolinguistic programming (NLP) as hypnosis. Occasionally I’ll still grab my wrist in a certain way to try and calm myself – that was one of the anchors.

Whether it was partly this, or partly expunging myself each week to her in general, even if still in a detached way, something must have helped in some way, because it was after seeing Edith for a few months that I started looking for work again.

(For the record – when I got a job, thinking I was back on track, I didn’t return to Ian. I did eventually receive a notification to attend a CBT session back at Holywell, but it was in the mornings, and that clashed with work, though as I was part-time back then, afternoons were ‘do-able’. I let Holywell know this, but was told that the group sessions only took place in the mornings and that therefore I’d have to wait another while for individual therapy. I never heard from them again).

A initially advised me against going to the four interviews I got at this point, as I would totally lose it each morning before the interview of that day. But I somehow forced myself to go to them all, and in the end was offered two of the four positions (I had temped briefly at the full-time one, and had other experience in the area, so no doubt that helped). Ultimately, I took the part-time one, because (a) I felt really encouraged by the staff I’d met at my interview, (b) it was in part working with animals and (c) I felt that a part-time position would be a better way to ease myself back into work.

Unfortunately, it didn’t entirely work out well, as despite appearances some of the staff weren’t quite so nice – but that’s another story. I did keep in touch with two of my colleagues from there (AC and DL), and thus am still grateful for the experience. Anyhow, I applied for another part-time job, got it, then a few months later got promoted to a more senior and full-time job. This is my ‘current’ job.

Things were fine for about a year, though the year had many stresses – V’s death and the will fiasco, a change of manager, a lot of stresses in the job itself that really shouldn’t have happened. Eventually, I was becoming increasingly agitated and depressed, and even dreading going to meetings as I knew I would only have a pile of extra work laid at my door, when it wasn’t possible to do any more. I was becoming increasingly neurotic and disillusioned with life in general, and one day I cracked and rang my mother in tears, begging her to put an appointment on with the bloody GPs the next day.

This she did, and that was the last day I was in work.

The Crisis Response Team (CRT)

I initially saw the Nurse Practitioner that day but when she heard I wanted to die and I couldn’t see a future for myself (amongst other things), she said, “you know, you’re really ill,” and decided to involve one of the partners in the practice.

He, in turn, decided that I needed to urgently see specialist mental health professionals and arranged for someone to come out to my house that day.

I am not sure that I have enough pejorative terms for the two women that turned up. Whilst the first one was friendly enough, when the other (apparently the more senior) one took over, she was incredibly passive and didn’t stand up for me, so I hold her as well as her colleague culpable for my annoyance.

Despite outlining how unbearably bad I felt, despite trying to tell them why, despite all the efforts I made to convey the longevity and seriousness of my condition to them, the more senior woman said I should “perhaps try meditation”. I actually laughed, thinking this was some sort of twisted piss-take, but her facial expression conveyed the information adequately that she was not joking. For the record, I have no problem with meditation, but don’t believe it’s a substitute for proven medical intervention.

She continued by asking me to analyse a scenario. Bloke A is in the park with his six brats running around screaming and doing my head in. What’s my reaction? “That Bloke A should die.”

“Alright,” she said, “now assume you approach Bloke A and tell him to shut his children up, and he apologises to you and says it’s just that his wife died that morning. What’s your reaction now?”

“My reaction is that while I am sorry for his loss, Bloke A should die.”

She looked puzzled and said, “but don’t you see that there are different ways of looking at things?”

“Yes,” I said, “I’m not stupid. What is your point?”

Apparently I was not recognising that there was an alternative viewpoint to the behaviour of Bloke A’s children and his inability (or unwillingness) to discipline them.

“That is incorrect,” I protested. “I do accept that there’s an alternative viewpoint. I still think he should die as his grief isn’t my problem. In fact, I’m offended on behalf of his wife. Shouldn’t he be taking his kids to see her parents or something? Or, in an alternative viewpoint, let’s assume the wife’s parents are dead – surely she has some family? Shouldn’t he be engaging with them and sharing grief? Or if he needed to be alone, why isn’t he alone? I appreciate that it’s possible that neither he nor his wife have any friends, family nor colleagues, but I think even you’d agree that that’s unlikely.”

But apparently I still missed the point.

After a long and protracted argument, about the above scenario, meditation and other issues, I admitted defeat and told the two of them that I was disgusted that my national insurance went towards their salaries.

This comment was ignored and they agreed to refer me to a…take a guess…wow-ee, a CBT therapist! Deja vu, anyone?

As they left, they told me it was “lovely” to have met me (so they’re liars as well as morons). Perhaps needless to say, I didn’t return the ‘compliment’.

The Cognitive Behavioural Therapist – Margaret

Given my previous experience of CBT therapists twatting about, I knew if the dumb bints from the CRT even did refer me (which it turned out they hadn’t), that I’d be waiting a while for it, so back I went to one of the GPs, and again asked for advice on a private therapist, though this time I specified that I wanted to try CBT rather than psychoanalysis.

Enter Margaret, at £90 an hour.

Although I liked her as a person, it was Margaret that gave me my intensely negative view of CBT. Initially, I was cautiously optimistic, but it didn’t last. As is apparently typical in CBT, now that I’ve read about the process more in-depth, she would have me analyse the likelihood of a perceived negative event. As a very rudimentary example, someone I know walks past me in the street without speaking to me. I can (a) assume (s)he hates me or (b) rationalise it – maybe (s)he didn’t have her glasses on, maybe (s)he was on his/her mobile, maybe they’re depressed.

Um…so? I know there are a million other explanations and I know that it is almost certainly not about me unless there has been a very clear reason for that, such as an argument. I already fucking know all that, I don’t need anyone to patronise me about it. The question is how does one really believe it? When I asked Margaret that, she said you just have to have an evidential base for the belief, which tallies with the literature on the subject, but that’s bullshit in my view as it’s already been recognised as utterly irrational by me; I already see and recognise that evidential base, but it’s doesn’t stop me from believing that the worst case scenario is the case, even if I don’t rationally believe it. If that makes any sense.

Another technique would be to directly face that which is most feared. As an example of this, I told her that I was freaking out about an interview for a job for which I’d applied, and she said I must go, as exposure to the event would be helpful.

I ended up in LGP’s office having gone totally batshit, and he gave me Diazepam for the first time.

In fact, I actually did go to this interview, and of course it didn’t go badly (in the sense that the panel weren’t Satan Incarnate; it did go badly in the sense that they were looking for someone much more qualified than me). But I already knew it would never be as bad as my panic was making it out to be. This happened another few times – I would utterly and completely lose it, even though I knew it could almost certainly not be as bad as my losing it would suggest. It doesn’t matter than I’m rationally aware of probable realities. It doesn’t matter that I know the worst that can happen is that the interview panel don’t like me or that I don’t get the job, and it doesn’t matter that neither of these things are likely to matter in the grand scheme of things.

I still fucking go mental when I’m under stress, or sometimes (mostly, actually) ‘just because’. Furthermore, in the case of the latter, I am not losing it because of any specific reason – as such, how can I rationalise what I fear? I mean, I don’t (consciously) know what the fear is in those moments. Even if I did, I already know anything a CBT-like approach could teach me.

Although I liked Margaret, I became increasingly disillusioned with the CBT approach, not to mention the fact that I was beginning to get into horrific debt – meaning that her employer’s ludicrously high charges were too much for me to pay. So that was the end of that.

My mother happened to be seeing the Nurse Practitioner at the GPs’ ‘surgery’ on an unrelated matter. The Nurse asked how I was getting on, and my mother said that things were not good. Upon a brief glance at my records, the Nurse saw that no referral had been made for me by the CRT for psychotherapy (I knew they were incompetent).

The Nurse therefore took it upon herself to make a referral. Fortunately for me, though, she cocked it up and didn’t make it specifically for CBT, like it was meant to have been when the bitches from CRT decided upon it.

I was really struggling during this period, and at my behest, had my medication changed to 40mg of Citalopram daily, which is the highest dose they were prepared to give me. It was at this juncture that the GP I saw decided to refer me to a psychiatrist, on top of the Nurse Practitioner’s referal to a psychologist. I finally saw her about five months later, despite the fact the waiting list was less than three months at the time. Contextual links follow later.

It was somewhere after my CBT with Margaret than I began to believe I probably had more than ‘just’ clinical depression and anxiety. I didn’t really investigate anything further at the time, but I recognised that for a while I’d been experiencing a wider set of symptoms. I assumed, rightly as it turned out, that seeing a psychiatrist would shed some light on this.

A relatively short period after my mother’s appointment with the Nurse Practitioner, I received a questionnaire through the post asking me to outline my psychological difficulties to help cut waiting times for a psychologist. I was prompt and, I hope, thorough in my completion of this document.

Some weeks later, I received a letter from the same hospital in which I’d seen the first assessment woman, asking me to attend an assessment with Dr C J, a clinical psychologist. Mum and I were both raging, as we wondered how many more fucking assessments it would take before they actually offered treatment? In both of my previous assessments, I then was simply moved to a waiting list for whatever the treatment deemed appropriate was. Still, I went along, because one has to do things the way the NHS wants.

The Multi-Disciplinary Psychologist – C

I’m not giving his first name. I’ve already told him I’ll keep all references to him here anonymous, and even though his first name wouldn’t give away his identity exactly, there’s always the chance that someone who doesn’t already know may find out who I am and work it out from there.

The ‘assessment’ session with C ended up turning into three assessment sessions, because he actually took the fucking time to discuss each of the points raised in the aforementioned questionnaire in detail with me. Surely he must have been breaking NHS protocol by actually taking his time over it?

I didn’t know what to make of him at first. His intellect was obvious, and I respected that, but there was something indefinable about him that I found quite irritating. Nonetheless, when I told him I thought CBT was a load of crap, even though I wasn’t a psychological expert, he accepted that and said that I was certainly the expert in myself, and that if that didn’t work for me, then it didn’t.

By the end of the three sessions, whatever it was that irritated me about the man was beginning to abate, and when he said that he would continue to treat me, rather than someone else, I was glad. We initially agreed to six weeks (his optimistic suggestion), shockingly commencing the following week! Progress at last. He did warn that although it might be mutually attractive, we couldn’t let our sessions become some sort of intellectual endeavour (as had been the case with Ian, though C is not entirely familiar with all that). I did stress that I couldn’t abide being talked down to, nor could I bear to not communicate comfortably because I had to ‘dumb down’ what I was saying. C accepted that and stated that he would be glad to have an intelligent dialogue with me, but it wasn’t to become a discussion of my issues as a psychological abstract; it still had to be directly about me. Given my narcissism, I was happy enough to acquiesce to this.

During those first six weeks, I began to grow from being pretty indifferent to him, to becoming really rather fond of him. He seemed to have got the mix right between employing intelligence and empathy in his approach – this is a position I still maintain about him. At the end of those first six weeks, I burst into tears in his office and begged him not to abandon me, as he was the first therapist to really ‘get’ me out of the many I’ve seen. We agreed to another 10 weeks at that stage, and when those came to an end, another 12 (of which we have presently had two sessions, with the third tomorrow). I see him once a week, first thing on Thursday mornings.

Perhaps because of his balance between intellect and empathy, rather than just one of them being in evidence, I have opened up considerably to him and have even shown the dreaded emotion, though I still curb it to some extent a lot of the time. I’ve told him stuff I’ve told no other living being.

In essence the therapy is mainly psychodynamic, though he has tried – usually to my annoyance – to bring stuff like DBT into the mix. His rationale is fair; psychodynamnic exploration is important, but when I lose it I need practical help too. I’m still dubious about DBT, but at least it has an ancient philosophical background which CBT doesn’t.

The main thing I’d say about my relationship with C is that there is a bond between us now. I am horribly attached to him, and whilst I won’t delude myself into pretending that he returns that attachment, I do think he likes and gives a damn about me. He is the first of all of these people that I have actually experienced transference towards, which is demonstrative of the fact that my psychotherapy with him just might be the vehicle I need to a recovery of sorts, as of course the phenomenon is generally expected to manifest if the therapy is to have any hope. Transference does cause me to get annoyed with him over very little at times. He causes me to get annoyed with him at times; the way he’ll avoid a question infuriates me, but this is him trying to avoid getting into a intellectual discourse with me, for the most part.

But all this transference, bonding etc is not to say that the process is fun; quite the opposite. It’s intense, overwhelmingly so at times. It often (ironically) depresses or angers me, saddens me, has made me lose it a couple of times. Even though I’ve opened up to him on many issues, I am still incredibly defensive and tend to (figuratively) run away if he hits a nerve. Yet somehow he manages to get most of it out of me eventually, showing his subtle but evident skill. I always crack up though. But then I always expected that things would get worse before they got better, because I have not faced any of my ‘baggage’ in any real depth before.

Overall, it’s possibly the most difficult sustained experience I have ever been through, but nonetheless, I think the relationship is a very good one, and despite the regression in my condition since I met him, in conjunction with his colleagues in Psychiatry, I have a glimmer of hope that, over time, C may be able to help me get some control back over my life.

The Psychiatrist – Dr C

Again, no names. In this case I don’t even know their first names anyway.

Obviously she’s not a psychotherapist and exists mainly to monitor my illnesses from a medical point of view. But I want to hat-tip her anyway, for providing my diagnoses back in June. Dr C also changed my medication to Venlafaxine on that occasion, but was open to the possibility of adding further medication to the cocktail should it prove necessary.

Unfortunately it took a hell of a lot of trouble to finally get to see her (it was only in discussing self-harm and suicide ideation with C that I was ever seen by them) and now that I have met her, it apparently takes a lot to continue to be seen on a regular basis. Basically, I feel fucked over by her, just like I have been by the NHS on several occasions, but meh. I ought to be used to it.

At least, though, when she does bother to show up, she seems to be willing to tackle my case in a straight-up fashion and to do something that might actually have something like a positive effect, so in conjunction with C, I have my fingers cautiously crossed.

So there you have it. The life of the Serial Insomniac through therapy. I realise that I have whinged an awful lot in the early part of this post that people kept attributing my madness to teenage angst. For what it’s worth, I do understand why this was thought to be the case, for the laypeople anyway, and I am working towards letting go of my anger in that regard, though it’s not easy.

It is only now, about 14 years after first really feeling that there was something psychologically wrong with me and about 13 after seeing someone about it, that I feel I might actually be finally moving in the right direction.

I expect it to be a slow process, but I’d rather have that than have no hope of regaining control at all.

Apparently BPD has a decent prognosis in the right circumstances, though I certainly won’t hold my breath. Bipolar disorder has no known cure. Either way, I’m not asking for ‘cures’. I accepted years ago that I will probably be on medication for the rest of my life; I am fine with that, and I am not against some sort of semi-regular ‘top-up’ psychotherapy after completing my main course, if that is what is required. Cures are not what I seek, as discussed in more detail here and here.

But I do want to be able to at least be functional, and I do hope that with C’s help, maybe – just maybe – I might be able to regain enough control to achieve that. I don’t know. The journey will continue to play out on this blog.

Lucky you, dear reader. If you’re still reading this post, then I’m amazed and don’t understand how you’ve not passed out or even died of boredom. Even by my verbose standards, this is fucking long. So, until ‘C: Week 23′, so long.

Aug 292009
 

I had what I felt was a really good session with C on Thursday.  That, to me, seems like an odd thing to say, as the best I’ve had to say upon departure in the past is that it ‘wasn’t bad’ or some such, but I actually left the other day feeling very positive about the whole thing.

I’m not entirely sure why; I felt reassured and taken seriously, and felt the dynamic between the two of us was good. Not that it isn’t normally, but it seemed to ‘flow’ particularly well and naturally on Thursday morning.

Apart from the very start, that is; he always wants me to start the session, and I almost never know where to begin unless something has been very definitely playing on my mind.  Plus I hadn’t slept all night and had missed a dose of the dreaded Venlafaxine, so I was kind of two seconds behind him intellectually.

Eventually, with my inability to articulate myself, C decided he would draw attention to my starting arguments with A over nothing (see here, and latter part of here), as we had discussed to some extent last week.  I didn’t really have much to add to that, to be honest, mainly as I don’t remember the circumstances on many of the occasions.

So began a discussion regarding disassociation.  He thinks that I have amnesia as regards the stupid arguments because then I completely freak out that I am going to be abandoned, so in order to cope with the enormity of that in my mind, I have to disassociate from myself and the world.  He went on to lead a dconversation on what can be done to “ground myself in the moment” when I first start to notice negative feelings that could cause me to lose it and ultimately disassociate.

He asked me what I thought I could do in such a situation.

I laughed and said, “you don’t honestly want me to answer that with sincerity, do you?”

C pretended to be perplexed by this apparently cryptic comment but he knew as well as I did that it was a reference to self-harm.  I said, “what I think I can do in such a situation is carry a knife about with me.”

He muddled his face, but laughed when I admitted this was probably not the best idea in light of the police crackdown on knives thanks to so much knife crime doing the rounds in the UK and Ireland of late.

But I continued, asking him what the problem with self-harm was – he made some comment to the effect that it was potentially dangerous, but I waved my hands dismissively at him and pointed out that any cuts I made were superficial.

“Look at me,” I challenged.  “Apart from where I’ve picked the spots on my face, can you see any scars?”

He looked me up and down, and eventually concluded that he couldn’t.

Excellent.  “In that case, what’s the problem?” I asked.

He thought about it for a minute or two, then said something like, “don’t you think it can have negative consequences?”

I complained that because my entire abdomen is covered in stuff like ‘hate’, ‘death’, ‘vile’ etc, that it would certainly make it difficult to get a cut-price* full-body massage from A’s sister, a beautician, but beyond that minor disability, I didn’t really see any negative consequences.  As stated a million times here, cutting is quick, and it works.

(* Perhaps a poor choice of term given the subject matter?!).

“Other people vilify self-harm,” I whinged.  “I don’t get it.  What’s the big deal?  It’s effective, and if it’s superficial – ie. not life threatening, and none of these scars would have been – then I really fail to see the problem.  What is it?”

“If I define a problem, you’ll see me as someone who wants to defy or contradict you,” he replied.  “If I don’t, then you’ll take that as carte blanche to inflict self-harm on yourself, as the perceived need arises.”

I don’t consciously think that would have been the case, personally.  I was asking him to explain what, objectively, the problem with self-inflicted injury is, given that it’s a speedy and effective antidote to severe agitation.  But to be fair to him, I can’t tell you what my unconscious might have thought if he’d answered the question directly, and knowing this, I let it pass.

I noticed that he was trying to avoid making me aware of any judgement he may have had on self-harm, but predictably he did reiterate that there are other methods I can use to “ground myself” rather than merely grabbing the nearest sharp object and slashing myself.  We discussed briefly the DBT methods such as breathing techniques, using rubber bands and/or ice cubes to hurt myself.

He said that he thinks I can appreciate that there are times when they can be effective distractions, but that maybe I do not garner the same satisfaction from them.

I affirmed this.  I told him that even the simple cuts I’d inflicted to my arm this night didn’t have anything like the satisfaction of a big, angry ‘HATE‘, which I kept going back to and looking at in awe.  If that is the case, how can breathing or whatever possibly offer an appropriate level of satisfaction?

However, I continued by telling him that whilst I certainly didn’t necessarily dismiss these techniques completely, I saw this whole coping method as being on a “sliding scale”.  I can’t remember how I expressed it, but I think I was suggesting to C that if I try these DBT methods and they don’t work to calm me, I can then give myself permission to cut myself, if it is the only thing remaining that will ease my distress.  I mean, it’s better than taking myself out, right?  …Right?!

I was astonished when C didn’t argue with this.  He didn’t agree with it, but he didn’t argue.  It reminds me a little of a recent documentary I saw on self-harm, hosted by author and comedian Meera Syal.  It told of a controversial treatment employed in some psychiatric hospitals (the featured one was Bethlam – still Bedlam to me – in London) in which the staff allow the patients to self-harm, as long as they document the incident in detail afterwards.  The young woman interviewed said that when she had been stopped from cutting, she simply found more inventive ways to harm – eating lightbulbs, throwing herself at the wall etc.  Obviously my example is considerably less extreme, but rightly or wrongly I felt that C was meeting me half way; if I was willing to try his methods, and they failed, he would reluctantly tolerate my methods, as long as they were implemented in a controlled and non-dangerous fashion.  Perhaps I read too much into this though – perhaps his decision not to argue was based around the aforementioned notion of my feeling (in his mind) that he was judging me, whatever way he responded.

He went on to state that he was “concerned that there’s two sides of you in conflict with each other – during a previous self-harm incident, you spoke of being in a trance-like state, saying, ‘it’s beautiful, it’s beautiful’ [this incident is discussed here] and finding that your mood dramatically improved after inflicting the cuts.  One side ‘hates’ the other and whenever she feels that side is getting out – for example, when she’s feeling depressed or lonely or anything that she perceives as weak, she has to be punished.  This then affirms her position as strong, and makes her feel better.  In suppressing the other her, though, she is ultimately repressing stuff and in the long-term is going to feel worse because of it.”

Two things strike me about this.  The first was that he spoke in the third rather than second person for so much of this particular part of the session.  I didn’t think about it at the time, but now I wonder if he thinks I have Disassociative Identity Disorder?  For what it’s worth, I don’t really actually think he thinks that, as it’s certainly not uncommon for a myriad of mental health issues to feature disassociative symptoms in some way.  But his choice of phraseology was interesting.

Secondly, I became completely fixated with the fact that he’d said he was “concerned”.  The word ‘concerned’!!!  He actually used it!  Any reference to him giving anything that vaguely resembles a shit about me in the past has been along the lines of, “…but if I do x, you’ll think I don’t care about you,” or whatever.  In this session, unsolicited, he actually outright stated that he was concerned for me.  I literally had to bite my bottom lip for some time to prevent a delighted smile.  This is a pathetic over-reaction and I think I need to die.  (Sorry, not allowed to say that.  Bad Side is suppressing Nice Side again.  Bad Girl.  I am not empathising with nor showing compassion to myself.  More on this later).

C said that I need to start recognising triggers for negative experiences.  He didn’t phrase it like that, but that’s what he meant I think.  He then went into a monologue about how humans do so many things on autopilot – cycling (“you’d probably fall off the bike if you started thinking about how you do it, actually”), opening doors, driving, breathing, whatever.  Such revelations nearly floored me, of course, who would ever have thought it, eh? [/sarcasm]  But his point was, if we do that for these innocuous processes, sometimes we can let an autopilot take over for more important matters.  In my case, he is of the view that I ‘automatically’ respond in an inappropriate (not that he used that word) fashion to (relatively) minor things.

He said, “imagine someone or something pisses you off, whether or not it was intended.  Stop a second.  Try breathing before you respond.  I know your reaction is an impulse but try and control it by remembering this discussion.  Then think about what’s going through your mind – identify the thoughts, emotions you experience, how you want to respond in light of that.”

Although that sounded way too easy to be true, the latter part of the instruction was interesting, as I had read very recently somewhere that it was important for individuals diagnosed with BPD to try and recognise the exact nature of their emotion; for example, rather than feeling ‘miserable’ or ‘low’, you’re ‘sad’, or you’re ‘depressed’, or you’re ‘scared’ or whatever.  I have to say that by and large I think I can identify these different experiences, though not necessarily when I’m in the middle of them, which is the issue I think C was driving at.

Back-referencing a little, he said the side that inflicts harm on herself experiences triumphalism in its wake, because she has won.  He said that in learning what’s going through my head and what I am actually experiencing, I could begin to develop some sort of sense of empathy for myself (or Bad Side could do so for Nice Side, whatever).

You can imagine my reaction to that, of course.  “We’ve been here before, C – I can’t imagine ever wanting to or being able to experience this empathy thing.”

“What’s the worst that can happen if you empathise with yourself?” he queried.

That took me aback somewhat, and I had to think about it.  Eventually, I said, “OK, I’m in the middle of an abject depression, feeling sorry for myself, so I stuff my face with chocolate and red wine (or maybe red wine isn’t the best idea when you’re already depressed, but you know what I mean).  How does that look?  ‘Oh, look at that lazy bitch, lounging around in her self-indulgence whilst nothing is wrong with her’.”

I paused then, my words reminding me of an earlier discussion with C in which he concluded that I was pathologically terrified of being scrutinised (negatively, at least) by others.  “What I’ve just said relates back to that, doesn’t it?” I mused, as an aside, and mostly rhetorically.

“Whatever the case,” he said, “what is clear is that you aren’t allowing any room for middle ground.  You can only be intensely self-critical or self-indulgent.  Is there any potential to reach a half-way point?”

I babbled on a bit incoherently about this for a minute.  C summed my position up better than I had by saying that whilst I could objectively appreciate there may be more of a grey area than my previous comments suggested, I didn’t really feel it.  Indeed.

“But what’s the point of empathy anyway?” I asked cynically.  “How is it going to make me feel less shit?”

I don’t remember exactly how he put it, but his response was something along the lines of if you fail to empathise with yourself, you fail to empathise with others, that can alienate others, thus making the self feel worse, etc etc.  (I knew altruism was about selfishness, really).

I said to C, “are you saying I’m a sociopath?”

“No!” he exclaimed instantaneously.  “No, no, no!”  He shook his head vigourosly and sort of put his hands out as if to stop me saying stuff like that.

“I’m sorry,” I said, “I was joking – I just did so much about psychopathy at university that I found it funny how closely what you just said matched the description of that condition.”

He sort of laughed, and yet again he insisted emphatically that no, he does not think I am a sociopath.  Well, that’s one less thing to worry about, then.

As if to prove his point, he went on to say that in fact I am more than capable of expressing empathy; the thing is I tend to express it towards inanimate objects, such as Disraeli, my car.  (Case in point: on Thursday night I ended up in tears thinking that I had ‘offended’ a lamp.  Yes, folks; a lamp.  Repeat after me: SI is not a loon, SI is not a loon – keep repeating it and we might CBT ourselves into believing it, right?).

Having read over parts of this blog for something to do during the particularly painful bout of insomnia the night before this meeting with C, I remembered another set of ‘objects’ (in the psychological and philosophical, not physical, sense) for whom I do feel empathy: my online friends.

C’s assertion on that occasion was that, perhaps, online relationships are, for me, ‘safe’, just like inanimate objects.  I had dismissed it at the time as even though I’ve not met any of my current online friends in person, I still do see them as very real.  However, I thought about it on Wednesday night / Thursday morning and concluded that he might have a point, as long as he accepted that the personnel concerned were still ‘real’ to me.

I raised it with him.  Did he still think that?

He sort of shrugged without shrugging, if that makes any sense; whatever the gesture was, the implication was that it was something to which he was open, without necessarily feeling that it is fact.  Indeed, he said, “it’s an idea.”

I told him that I now thought he had a point, and he went on to voluntarily tell me that if we accepted that this was possibly indeed the case, that I was definitely not to think that it diminished the importance of my internet friends in my life, nor was the implication that I – nor he, for that matter – saw them as ‘unreal’ figures.  (Though what is real anyway?  Sometimes I wonder about the validity of solipsism.  An aside – in Googling ‘solipsism’ to double check the spelling, I came across Solipsism Syndrome – what a cool psychiatric diagnosis to have!  I wonder if I can try and get it.  I would probably have to fulfill my childhood dream of becoming a professional space-based cosmologist, however, and that’s not fucking likely).

Anyway.  What was I saying?  Right, so C said t’folks on t’internet are still very real and important friends.  “But,” he continued, “online relationships are…” – he searched for appropriate words – “…less complex than ‘real life’ ones.”

I accepted this, but did want to make it clear to C that I wasn’t engaging in the “less complex” relationships to avoid dealing with the “more complex” ones.  “My real life friendships are stable,” I said, “even if there are fairly few of them.  I haven’t sought out new ones for a very long time, but I’m not sure that’s related.  I’m socially inept, I’m a misanthrope, I just can’t deal with people.”  Certainly, I admitted, I don’t trust people and fear being hurt, but there are other factors.  They’re probably related via some electron cunt thing in my brain somewhere, but they aren’t consciously so.

“But then,” I continued, “it’s funny being me.  If I’m in some sort of hyper or manic mood then I tend to be exceptionally good with people, if over-talkative and arrogant at times.”  As a relevant example, I related having met A’s parents the other weekend, when I was pretty manic and apparently good craic (for those uninitiated to Northern Ireland Speak, ‘craic’ is pronounced ‘crack’, though does not denote drugs ((well, beyond dopamine and/or serotonin, I suppose)).  It means ‘fun’, ‘entertaining’, ‘a laugh’, etc).  And about how A’s mother had cross-examined him on the phone afterwards wondering (in not so many words, to be fair to her) how I could possibly be mentally ill in any way when that was the behaviour I exhibited in front of her.  I can see her point.

“This annoys me,” I continued.  “I cannot stand ambiguity or unpredictability.  I used to work with a woman who was terribly moody.  One day you’d go in and she’d call you all the names of the day.  The next she’d throw her arms round you and practically declare undying love.  It infuriated me.  Either always be nice, or always be a bitch; don’t fuck about.  I don’t know how to deal with you if you fuck about.  Point being, I don’t know how to deal with me if I fuck about.  I want certainty.”

I paused, and asked C if I was rambling.

“If I say that you are, you will perceive me as being critical, but if I say that you aren’t, you’ll feel I didn’t really take an interest in what you said.”

I tilted my head and stared at him enigmatically.

“What?” he asked.  “What do you think?”

“I think if you answered the question you’d be someone who answered a question.”

He smiled in an odd sort of way, almost as if he was embarrassed.  I’m not sure what his exact response but he was basically asking if he thought I thought he avoided answering questions a lot.

Well, dear readers, you will know that this is indeed the case.  His ability to bullshit around a question is akin, at times, to that of a politician.  I know that there are probably fair reasons for this – “NHS Guideline 1,090,073.233.642 – Thou must patronise the stupid mental to avoid said stupid mental having a clear or definitive idea of the service thou hast provided or that thou willst provide, thus ensuring the NHS is not taken under the ludicrous claim culture of the 21st Century” – but it still winds me the fuck up.  I actually feel bad even writing something remotely critical, because me likes C today.  And thus was the case at the time too; in fact, it was almost a reversal of previous situations, as I became the one who avoided the question.  I can’t remember exactly what I told him but it was something like my conscious mind at least would not pass judgement on him answering the question honestly.  I deliberately refrained from referring to whether or not there was a reflection of him anywhere in there.

“OK,” he said, “I think we maybe need to trackback a bit.”

Which means he did think I was rambling, and I wondered that when I was evidently going to realise that, why he didn’t just answer my original question, but I forgave him and let him continue.  To be honest, my memory is not 100% clear on what it was to which he actually did backtrack, but it was something to do with the whole empathy crap.  Presumably I am meant to allow myself to be hyper or whatever and not berate myself for it.

He asked me if I had heard of a bloke called Paul Gilbert.  I had.  I read his Overcoming Depression when I was about 16.  It wasn’t the most patronising self-help book I’ve ever read, even if it employed a bit of CBTish nonsense, but nonetheless, here I am about 10 years later and I’m completely off-my-head mental, so it didn’t exactly fucking cure me, did it?

C said, “there are two books of his that could be useful; they both have ‘compassion’ in the title…” He trailed off, I am convinced in order to gauge my reaction to this.

I actually laughed out loud.  Naturally, he wasn’t surprised by this and in fact laughed a little himself.

“…one is an academic book,” he continued, “the other is…” He paused again.

“Self-help,” I said, finishing his sentence with evident disdain.

“Quite.  I know you’d prefer the more intellectual style of the first one, but…”

“Let me stop you there,” I interrupted.  “If you’re asking me to read one of these, it’s going to have to be the first one.  There are a few things I can’t tolerate in life, and being patronised is one of them.  That’s what self-help books do, sorry.”

“Isn’t that like saying that all works of fiction are shit?” he asked.

“Well…OK, it’s a gross generalisation, but I can only speak from my own experience, and my own experience of self-help books is that they’re universally shit.”

To be fair to him, C admitted that a lot of them are rubbish.  He described the ones like that as having a “new-agey American* love-in tone”, which he appreciated I would hate, and for which he didn’t have much time either.  But he was keen to make clear that in his view they’re not all like that.

(* Sorry American readers – his words, not mine.  I did laugh though, I admit, and he did acknowledge that there are plenty of British knobs writing the same wank.  I’m sure cynical readers will appreciate what was meant; the whole “you can change your life by thinking happy thoughts about your inner rainbow flying out of your arse [ass, if it's Transatlantic, presumably].  Remember, I – who do not even know who you are because I am merely  writing this bollocks and not spying on everyone who buys it [hopefully] – love you, and so does everyone else despite the fact that in your life you’re likely to meet maybe 0.0000000000000014% of the world’s population, some of whom will actually hate you, except that they don’t because everyone loves you, because that’s the way it works in my world which is as black and fucking white as yours, except I pretend it is white whereas you think it is black.  Remember, the only person that doesn’t love you is you, except for all the world’s population that are indifferent to you because they don’t know you exist, not to mention the ones that do know you exist and think you’re a prick!  Smile, it can change your day and help you love yourself, not to mention the added bonus of a punch in the face because people think you are a smug, condescending piece of shit!  You are worth loving, for now at least because if you feel worthwhile you will feel inspired to recommend me to your wrist-slashing friends and I will earn even more undeserved money! Etc etc, blah blah, yadda yadda, now fuck off cos I’ve got my royalties from your purchase you despicable, self-indulgent, psycho piece of shit that I’m exploiting by writing this jism” thing).

Ahem…*clears throat*.  Again, where was I?  Yes, C was keen to reinforce his point to me that not all self-help books are of the ilk of the preceding paragraph.  He went over to his desk and looked both books up on Amazon.  I joined him, and he showed me that – slightly unusually for Amazon UK – they had the ‘Read Inside’ feature.  He turned to me and asked if I would look up the self-help one, read inside it, read the reviews of it and at least consider getting it (or, “if I must”, the academic one).

We sat down again, and I agreed to at least look into it.  “If I buy it, though, and it’s rubbish,” I wryly told him, “I’m sending you the invoice.”

To wind C up, I told him that I was reading a very analytical and academic book at present called Social Factors in the Personality Disorders: A Biopsychosocial Approach to Etiology and Treatment.  The effect of this attempt to tease him was rather lost because I couldn’t remember the name in its entireity.  FAIL!  He said, “that sounds interesting.”  It wasn’t meant to sound interesting; it was meant to underline the point that I need something ‘proper’ to read.  But the fault is mine for not remembering the name properly.  (For some reason, I never can.  I have to go back and search through my previous posts here if I don’t have it to hand, as the book in question was very kindly recommended to me by one of my commentators, beautifulstones).

To compensate for not having the intended effect, I decided to be critical of Lost in the Mirror, which I recently finished, reviewing it as having “interesting psychological points, and being empathetic towards this hateful borderline condition, but not being helpful because of its extraordinarily childish and ergo patronising prose.”

I was interested to note that the above was the first time since I related my diagnoses to C that I have used the term ‘borderline’ in front of him.  Hitherto the very thought of doing so has made me cringe.  I still avoided looking at him when I said it, but say it I did.  This is progress.  As anyone who read the end of this post will know, I was convinced C would no longer wish to treat me, given the intense dislike of BPD that still permeates many mental health professionals.  Thankfully, it does not at all seem to be the case.  (Incidentally, regarding the diganosis of BPD, there has been an interesting discussion on the comments of my last post regarding its validity.  I had hitherto had little doubt that it was correct, but some interesting points against it were raised).

To get back to the books C had recommended, I asked if ‘compassion’ referred to extending same to the self, or to others.  He contended that they go in tandem; one feeds off the other.  I wondered to what extent I agree with that, as whilst feeling I am a complete piece of crap I don’t necessarily that think others are (not that the concept of compassion is as simple as that, but you know what I mean).  On reflection, though, I do think it makes some sort of sense.  I am incapable, or at the very least unwilling, to demonstrably extend compassion to others in my life who clearly deserve it at times.  When my Mum’s partner died when I was 11, my way of comforting her was to say something like, “um…right…sorry?”  When her brother died when we were on holiday in 1996, I couldn’t deal with her grief and started an argument with her!  (For the record I am citing these examples only here; I didn’t relate them to C at the time because I didn’t think of them).

After he’d stated his position on compassion, I must’ve looked contemplative because he asked me to articulate my thoughts.  I said, “I’m not for one second going to sit here and tell you I don’t need practical help for being mad; clearly I do.  However, I am keen that we also establish the causal roots of my mental health problems – I don’t want to just have the symptoms treated, you know?”

He jumped in quickly to that, emphatically denying that providing practical treatment alone was what he intended.

“I think, intellectually, you’d much prefer something like psychoanalysis…”

I interjected stating that I didn’t want to still be sitting in his office every Thursday morning in ten years’ time, but let’s face it – as of now that is a lie.  I would be quite happy for that to be the case.  Or at least I would at the minute – there are times when I don’t want to see C ever again for as long as I live, but now isn’t one of them.

“…but,” he went on, acknowledging my comment only with a subtle grin, “you present a number of symptoms that are proven to be treatable by practical methods, so I think it’s important we do some work in that regard.  Having said that, it’s only one dimension to what we should be doing here – I do agree that we need to delve deeper and explore causes.”

“A dual approach,” I murmured.

He nodded, then looked directly at me, smiling reassuringly.  “Don’t worry,” he said.  “We’ll get there.”

I am not sure I will ever forget the profound feeling of reassurance I took from those five words.  Anyone can say something like that, of course, but I felt that he really believes we can get ‘there’, wherever ‘there’ is.  Not only that, but he wants to get me ‘there’, not (just, anyway) because he has to meet some stupid Health Service quota or because he’s scared of getting in trouble because I have topped myself or ended up in the bin, but because he actually gives something of a fuck.

This was the end of the session.  As I was walking out the door, he said, “all the best,” which is not something he’s said to me in ages – perhaps not since our initial assessment meetings back in February or March.  It’s a stupid thing to feel pleased about, of course, but it just adds to my general feeling about the session.  The whole thing, however temporarily, set my perpetually troubled mind at ease, at least as regards psychotherapy, which can be a difficult and murky process.  I felt there was a clear rapport in the dynamic, perhaps even a sense of camaraderie insofar as that’s permissible in the circumstances and the relationship, and moreover, C seemed to me to make a real effort to try and alleviate a number of concerns I expressed.  ‘Reassure’ is a word I’ve used a lot on this post, and whilst it’s still the most appropriate one I can find, it doesn’t even seem to grasp the safety I felt.

In terms of my current thinking, almost two days later, I hesitate to use the word ‘hope’, because I’m way too cynical to even believe in that concept anymore, in its most abstract sense anyway.  But let me put it this way; for now, for this week at least, and even if it never happens again, I feel a very slight tingle of cautious optimism that there may be some light somewhere down the tunnel, that is for once not a train hurtling towards me.

Bookmark and Share

Aug 262009
 

The below is a list of symptoms that I have experienced since starting to take Venlafaxine (75mg) from 15 June.  It is redacted in places, for either personal reasons or to help the ‘flow’ of this post, but essentially this is from a list I have been maintaining with the intention of showing Dr C when I finally see her again on 8 September.

  • Significant increase in (hypo?)mania I am very much the ‘life of the party’, very confident (at times to the point of arrogance, or being very over-talkative)
  • Significant increase in mixed episodes.
  • In both of the above obviously fragmentation, pace and disorder of thoughts are of increased severity.
  • Rapid cycling between (hypo?)mania and depression at times (ie – changes once or twice a week – occasionally more often, occasionally less so).
  • Significant increase in compulsion to (and execution of) self-harm. Execution of ‘creative’ cutting reduced a little after the initial six or so weeks, but is still sometimes happening and I still feel the compulsion strongly and with great frequency.   Any lack of execution of cutting is mainly due to environmental factors or preventative measures I have previously taken (eg. hiding knife). Head-banging, hair pulling, scratching at self all still very frequent.
  • Severe restlessness – compulsion to head-bang, to pace, get up, sit down, get up, sit down – noticed usually in tandem with severe anxiety and/or mixed states, but not necessarily limited to this (this was present before Venlafaxine but it was much less frequent and much less severe).
  • Psychosis – Increased and more severe delusions (frequency – circa once a week? Though hard to say) – eg sun (watching me), signs (sending me messages), iPod (reading my mind/mood), severe paranoia (trust issues even worse – everyone is out to get me).  Some hallucinations are of similar frequency as before, but are more vivid – shapes especially clear.  Now also hearing voices/whispers which are very audible – as opposed to nebulous – at times (obviously unaccounted for).  The frequency of the voices – there are no hard and fast rules, some weeks this is frequent, some weeks there are none at all.  No specific time. Content is not ‘demanding’, it just says stuff like saying my name, asking what I’m doing – it is meaningless ‘small talk’. The shapes are there most (but not all) nights as before, same nebulous form as previously, except sometimes with greater clarity.
  • Amnesia – eg. ending up in places with no idea how I got there or forgetting long discussions usually related to being mental.  Frequency of this is hard to determine – at a guess once a week? It depends – sometimes no such amnesia one week, sometimes several instances thereof.
  • Increased mood swings, independent of mania-depression-mixed states – eg. extreme and uncontrollable irritability, anger, frustration, lethargy, anxiousness (again, these mood swings have been strongly present long since taking Venlafaxine but seem to have increased since taking it).
  • Constantly exhausted – even more so than previously – except when I’m in a ‘manic’ state during which high energy levels are present.
  • Fantasy world is still there but seems less intense than previously – not sure whether this is a result of tablets or psychotherapy though?
  • Terrible forgetfulness – I go to do something and literally five seconds later I’ve forgotten what it was or what I went to do.  As with anyone this happened the odd time in the past but  for me it is now several times daily.
  • Horrible, vivid nightmares when I do manage to sleep. Once or twice a fortnight.  I very rarely had such dreams before taking this tablet (approximately once every few years). They focus mainly around my being attacked (physically or sexually) or painfully trying to kill myself – despite suicide ideation this is not pleasant at the time!
  • Suicide ideation seems increased to others (though not necessarily to me).
  • Others say ‘default’ mood is slightly improved but not still not to extent they would have hoped.  My own view is mixed.   I still feel profoundly depressed most of the time, but perhaps the intensity of that profundity is very slightly reduced (not always – but I think in the main). Furthermore, given the substantial increase in (hypo)mania, depression occurs less frequently – but is felt very strongly when it does due to the strong divergence in mood. Mixed states, which are now very common, are probably the worst state as when I am very depressed I don’t have enough energy to self-harm or seriously consider suicide, etc – in a mixed episode I do.
  • Others describe lows / mixed states as being of considerably worse severity.

Symptoms with No Change Since Taking It

  • Still feel depressed though as stated others comment that I seem to them to be less depressed during ‘normal’ periods and own view is that it may be very marginally improved at times.
  • Insomnia in a similar state, though general exhaustion and lethargy increased. Difficulty falling asleep – if and when I do, wake up frequently, even with medication (without sleep is usually non-existent beyond maybe half an hour or so).
  • Dependency / abandonment issues unchanged.
  • Narcissism, entitlement – though self-hate has definitely manifested more significantly since onset of psychotherapy (apparently unrelated to medication).
  • Misanthropy.  Mistrust of people.  Abject terror of work, work-related issues, going to unfamiliar places – I fall about in a mess even thinking about this stuff. This is all the same as before.  Despite all this, I experience a lot of paradoxical loneliness.
  • General levels and frequency of inappropriate anger is similar to before, though outbursts seem to be increased (as stated above).
  • Self-analysis, overthinking.
  • Dissociative symptoms – depersonalisation and derealisation seem mostly unchanged (apart from the development of amnesiac occurrences – presume this is related to dissassociation in some way?).
  • Continued personification of inanimate objects, feeling sorry for such things – no such sympathy or empathy for people (in general).
  • Fixation with death (as distinct from specific suicidal thoughts) is ‘stable’.
  • Complete and utter lack of motivation – no interest in everyday activities eg tidying, dressing,cooking etc.  Same as before.
  • Utter inability to concentrate or focus for anything more than a few minutes, except when mood is strongly elevated (and certainly not always then either). Very easily distracted, little ever gets done (applicable at all times).Memory rubbish too. Need to sit and plan things to have any grasp on them.
  • Eating problems similar to before.
  • Obsessional behaviour continues.
  • Black and white thinking and behaviour.
  • Post-morteming behaviour.
  • Other issues that I can’t think of.

In short, I think Venlafaxine could, potentially, help me with my depression – but the dosage would have to be increased, as the small improvements made in that regard are simply not sufficient to keep me sane.  More importantly, though, Venlafaxine is not only not helping all my other symptoms, but either it is making no difference or, more commonly, it is in fact increasing them.  I have described some of the horrors elsewhere on this blog.  The past few months have been fucking horrendous, by and large.  This is particularly the case, of course, as regards the bipolar symptoms.

As you can see from the link at the top of the page, Dr C refused to give me mood stabilisers when I last saw her as she believes that BPD is my primary diagnosis, and NICE advise against the use of them and anti-psychotics in BPD (though this seems to be the mainstay of treatment for borderline in other countries!).  That’s all well and good, but of course Venlafaxine is notorious for increasing or inducing manias and mixed states to those predisposed to them.  Given that circumstance, you would have thought that she would either have had the decency to listen to my plea for mood stabilisers at the time, or at the very least had her SHO keep the fucking July appointment that they cancelled.  If I, a complete psychiatric novice beyond my explorations on the internet, am aware of Venlfafaxine’s notoriety in this regard, surely a consultant psychiatrist, who herself diagnosed me with an illness on the bipolar spectrum, should have taken some bloody consideration of this?

In any case, I have forgotten to bring all my medications, including the bloody Venlafaxine, with me to an overnight visit to my mother’s house.  I am well aware of how hardcore missing doses of Venlafaxine can be, plus I also don’t have my sleeping pill so no doubt insomnia calls.  I’m sure, ergo, that tomorrow morning’s session with C will prove interesting…
Bookmark and Share

Aug 072009
 

For a variety of reasons I simply haven’t had the opportunity to blog about my most recent session with C to date, so, with it now being the septiversary of our last meeting, it seems appropriate to try and do it now before my memory of the meeting dwindles further.

Last week was weird, because for once he actually opened the conversation, rather than just fucking staring at me for 140,618 years, waiting with futility for me to express my thoughts. He wanted to know how I had coped the previous week without him, and what plans we were going to put in place in case (or rather when) I go batshit mad during his annual leave which will be ongoing until 20 August (might as well be 2079 to me right now for all the closer it seems).

I was encouraged by this: I thought he was going to explain the procedures that the CMHTs have in place to deal with attached-to-shrink mentals in the absence of said shrink.  Which of his colleagues should I contact in an emergency, who should I get it touch with should I need general advice, blah blah.

Was he fuck!  The exercise, and frankly most of the session, was a load of naval-gazing, useless dross.

“We need to formulate a plan,” he declared.  It seems his idea of a plan has four progressively mental points in the key of D:

  1. Mental: DBT Distraction Plan
  2. Quite mental:  Discussion About Being Mental
  3. Very mental:  Doctor – Either LGP or Out of Hours
  4. Suicidally mental:  Death Avoidance – Casualty

He didn’t use this stupid ‘D’ thing; that’s of my doing, because it’s equally fucking patronising to the whole bloody ‘plan’.  I actually laughed in his face about the discussion bit.

“Who the fuck am I going to discuss this with?” I asked.  He reminded me that the first time he’d been unavailable for a session I called D, my best mate, to expunge myself.  I don’t think I was keeping this blog then.  Not sure.  It was a while back anyway.

This is true, but whilst D is mostly aware of the issues that have given rise to my mental health issues, I really don’t want to discuss them in detail with him.  He reads this blog from time to time, but I’m quite analytical here, not off-my-head mental, so even though the material here may well be disturbing to normals, they don’t get to hear or actually witness what it’s really like. I need to protect people from it.

I said so to C, who by virtue of his chosen career has de facto committed himself to hearing about and witnessing disturbing behaviour.

He asked could I not speak to A, then.

Yes, I can, as it happens; he bears witness to many of the worst moments and is certainly aware of the others.  In fact, of late, I’ve noticed many of our conversations have been about my being mental – I think I’m trying to forge some sense of identity by being obsessed with my madness, but that’s an entire other post.  The point is talking to A doesn’t always alleviate the problems; not that it’s specific to A though, talking to anyone doesn’t make a difference, at least depending on the type of episode anyway.

Yet still C wanked on about it.  The Samaritans then.  Lifeline.  Some such 24 hour crisis line.

This was winding me up to fuck, so at this point I expressed my annoyance yet again through a cynical laugh.  This didn’t go down too well – not that he criticised me, but just because he’s the one trained to be perceptive doesn’t mean that he is the only one that actually is perceptive.  I could sense an annoyance, or at least a confusion, at my reaction to his suggestion.

I explained that whilst I had every admiration for the volunteers operating these services, recognised their well-meaningness, and in principle fully supported them, that I had not found them helpful in the past.  To be fair, I was overplaying my use of them, letting C believe I’d called them a number of times when in actuality it was only once or twice.  But when you know something isn’t helpful (or indeed is), then you do.

He hides it well, you know, but I sensed exasperation.  I said the point was that I cannot talk to anyone other than him, and to a lesser extent LGP and Dr C, about the darkest things.  Even then the discussions are abstracted, formalised or structured by me so that I can avoid talking about those things that I wish not to discuss (or at least discuss them in a ‘safe’ way).  In front of them, I don’t behave in the angry, frenzied, self-destructive way that I often do otherwise, and that I frankly long to do in front of them at times.  I try not to express emotion, and when I do I either force myself to desist from it or end up apologising for half an hour for my failure to control myself.

Simply put – it’s hard to talk to anyone.

Anyway, C said this was about my inability to ‘do’ empathy.  I asked what the hell ‘empathy’ had to do with it.

He said, “you despise the emotional side of yourself so much that you don’t allow yourself, or feel unable, to empathise with others, would you agree?”

“Not entirely,” I replied, “but in the main, I suppose the answer would be affirmative.  Why?”

“You can’t empathise with others because you can’t empathise with yourself.  I think that has to be one of our goals here, to allow you to gain, or regain, that sense of empathy.”

I protested that I didn’t want it, I don’t do emotions, I like to be rational, this arse shouldn’t come into my life, thank you very much, the end.

C wanked on and on about emotions for a while.  I do do them, of course, he contended.  He didn’t say this, because labels are so evil and unhelpful, don’t you know, but of course the cornerstone of a diagnosis of BPD is an inability to regulate emotions properly, thus you go mental.

So, he concluded, my emotions are clearly very strong, and my lack of empathy for myself is profound.  “For example,” he said, “you carved ‘hate’ into your body.  Don’t you think this is a way of expressing a strong emotion, without expressing it in a ‘normal’ fashion?”

Once more I laughed in his face.  “You think ‘hate’ is bad?” I sneered.  “You want to see some of the stuff that’s been added since!”

He raised his eyebrow and said, “you say that with almost a sense of glee.”

“Yeah.  So?”

“Well, I’m getting the sense that you delight in self-harm – it’s a further, and outer, manifestation of your self-hatred.  You mask ithe hatred well outwardly, for the most part, but you need to confront it eventually, in ways that aren’t self-destructive, in order to get over it.  Thus, you need to be able to empathise with yourself.” He also stated that carving things such as ‘hate’ into myself was a form of punishment for feeling emotions. He seems to think that’s at least partly why my mood improves after self-harm; I am sated because I am punished and have got what I deserve. Probably fair, admittedly.

“Yeah, whatever,” I said, “but the point is, cutting is quick, and it works.”

“Maybe so, but it is self-destructive.”

I shrugged.  I mean, he’s probably right in the sense that it is an outer manifestation of something I don’t generally express in other outward ways, such as through talking.  It certainly is self-destructive, though I don’t really see how that matters, but still, how could I argue?  I simply told him that I genuinely cannot foresee him being able to get me to ‘empathise properly’ – not in the manner that he means, anyhow.

An interesting side-note is that I’ve observed from re-reading parts of this blog that I’ve (unconsciously) stopped putting words like ‘emotion’ and ‘feelings’ in quote marks (except in circumstances like the immeadiate foregoing where they are necessary to denote they’re not active nouns in the sentence). I told C this, laughing that he must have made some progress with me in this particular area. Interestingly, he did seem mildly encouraged by this.

Anyway. We discussed suicide ideation for a bit, in relation to the stupid plan of action for when I go doolally in his absence.  He said something like, “…if you start thinking about suicide…” at which point I interrupted him, yet again with a sneering laugh, stating that I thought about suicide every hour of every day.

He asked why.

I said because I want to not exist.

He replied, in my view rather confrontationally, “so why have you not done it then?”

“Cowardice,” I responded instantly, without a mere second’s hesitation.  I’m fairly sure he was expecting some humming-and-ha-ing, but I’m already well aware of the answer.  I’m too fucking pathetically scared.

I did concede that not all shreds of altruism are lost amongst my endless waves of narcissism; in part, I haven’t topped myself because I know it would annoy A, Mum and my friends (plus – in my view, oddly – the family, but who cares about them).  But the main reason, selfish or otherwise, is simple cowardice.

He didn’t quite seem to know how to respond.  I think this was one of many points where he irritated me intensely by silently staring at the floor for what seemed like eons, with his index finger ensconsced thoughtfully over his mouth.  Eventually, this pissed me off so much that I said, “you do realise, don’t you, that I’m trying to work out what you’re thinking?  Isn’t that a role reversal?”

“Do you mean,” he enquired, “that you think you feel like the therapist?”

“That’s patently ridiculous,” I said, but in quite a nice way.  “I suppose I’m asking if you think I play mind games with you.”

“Do you?” he asked.

“I think so, yes.”  I told him I felt there were times when I challenged him, whether overt- or covertly, to work me out, or answer difficult questions, or respond to deliberately provocative statements.

“‘Mind games’ isn’t the terminology I’d use,” he said, “but if you want to call it that, fair enough.  I think you’re testing me, is all.  You want or need me to prove my competence, understanding, whatever – basically that I’m worthy of your trust or time.”

I agreed with this.  I told him that he would, of course, have worked out by now that I had very strong defences built up and thus have big problems trusting people until they’d proven themselves trust-worthy.

“Consider yourself lucky,” I smiled.  “I do trust you – yet I don’t know you at all.”

He asked how I felt about not knowing him; I responded by stating that “this relationship is asymmetrical of necessity.”

“Perhaps,” C said, “but that doesn’t mean you don’t find it strange.”

“Of course it’s strange,” I replied, waving my hand dismissively.  “But I can deal with strange.  I’m strange.  My life is strange.  Strange is normal to me.”  Fair is foul, and foul is fair, hover through fog and filthy air… [Macbeth, Act I, Scene I, if memory serves].

I don’t remember really what that led to, so the next few issues I remember raising were my ongoing problems with my cunt office, although that rant was brief, though I then launched into a major invective regarding the situation with Dr C.  Well, I say it was ‘major’ – it was, but it was also very measured.  I did say to C that I was extremely angry but I couldn’t go on about it too much as I risked behaving in a “psychotic pacing ranting fashion” and that I didn’t want to do that “in front of him.”  I did say that I was sick of the pillar-to-posting I’d experienced under the care of the NHS for over a decade, and that it was particularly frustrating that when things actually looked like they might be moving forwards, I was yet again rejected.  I whinged that when I needed Dr C most, due to the problems with my medication causing serious and frequent mixed episodes, it was the time she chose to abandon me the most.

[Alas.  It is now Friday 7th, thus I didn't get this published on Thursday 6th, the septiversary of my last meeting with C, as I had planned.  Apologies.]

The truth is, I was hoping C would contact Psychiatry and tell them that my self-harm is getting worse and my suicide ideation is out of control, which I think it is, given that most people don’t seem to think about suicide and death all day, even if they are rather batty.  I mean, he had most of Thursday and all day on Friday to contact them before he went off on his stupid fucking leave.  But he made no such offer, and a week has now passed without my having heard from them, so it’s evident he made no such contact.

What do you have to do?  What the fuck do you have to do?  Do I need to run into a busy shopping area pointing a shotgun at my head or climb, very publicly, to the top of a tall building with the threat of jumping, to convince them that this is fucking serious and that I need help?  Nobody gives a fuck.  No one.  I’m sure most of C’s silences during this session were him fantasising about 5pm on the Friday when he’d be free for over two weeks.

Anyway, before the end of the meeting, he returned to the wanky Four-D Perfect FoolProof Anti-Suicide Plan.

“Look,” I said.  “I promise not to be dead in three weeks, OK?!”

He looked over his glasses at me in that strange enigmatic way he sometimes does.  “But you’re promising me, not yourself,” he mused.

“So what?  The effect is the same, isn’t it?”

Essentially this relates back to my lack of self-empathy or some such bollocks.  Whatever, who cares.  He asked me to definitively agree a plan of action with him before I left.  I should have tried a new mind-game and pretended (or, more accurately, admitted) that I didn’t agree with anything he was saying so as I could have made the session overrun, just to see what he did or said.

I did say, and in fact although I didn’t mention it above I had said it earlier, that the problem with any of this stuff is that by the time you’ve gone mad enough to need it, you’re far too mad to do it.  Fairly simple concept, yes?

“In advance,” C said, “write it down.  You’ll then have something tangible to which to refer.”

“It doesn’t matter,” I protested.  “The entire house could be wallpapered with plans for what I should do when I go mental, but when I am mental none of it matters.”

I tried, with absolutely no success whatsoever, to describe what it’s like when I’m psychotic, or panicking, or experiencing a mixed episode.  I couldn’t put it into words, but the point was that even though I may maintain some small awareness of rational issues that exist outside my head, that I did not have the cognitive functions to actually put any such things into practice.

“What do you think the answer is then?” he asked, again in what I felt was a confrontational manner (though I could just have been paranoid – who fucking knows).

“Valium and sleeping pills,” I declared.

His concern was instantly piqued and he went to protest, but I pre-empted it by saying I wasn’t talking about overdosing on them (I know from the suicide newsgroup that there’s practically no chance it would fucking work even if I tried), but rather about knocking myself out for a few hours in the hope that by the time I woke I’d have returned to my default state of quasi-sanity,or at least vague rationality.

He seemed cynical of this.  I don’t remember what if anything he actually said, but I got the distinct message from him that drugs were only part of the answer, if even that.

We were running out of time, and he kept pressing me to work with him to formulate the stupid plan.  In exasperation and to just fucking pacify him I finally said, “right – distraction, discussion, GP and casualty, OK?”

“Yes,” C replied – relieved, I think – “but you may want to add layers in between.  Remember the breathing exercises as well, for example, or specific distractions of your own.”

Well, as it happens I don’t fucking want to add ‘layers in between’, because I don’t think the bloody thing is of any adequate use anyway, unless someone is acting on my behalf (in stages three and four anyway).  But fuck it, I just nodded.

He said, “our next appointment is 20 August.  Do you want an appointment card?”

I said yes, as I would be wont to forget that, as each day runs into another when one is a dolescum.  He wrote it out and handed it to me.  I was irritated in the extreme to observe that he’d written “Dr C. J.” on the front of it.

I have been seeing you for twenty weeks, C.  That’s about five monthsI FUCKING KNOW YOUR FUCKING NAME.

I got up and wished him a pleasant holiday (though part of me was secretly hoping he spent it in mild misery with ((non-fatal)) swine flu or something – but only part of me ;-) ), and he thanked me.  As I left, I said, “take care.”  I was offended by the fact he merely said, “bye” and didn’t reciprocate.  Funny how silly, meaningless little things take on such importance in the therapeutic setting.

This post has made it sound like I am absolutely raging with C and that our last session was a confrontational battle of wills.  Neither of these are really true; it comes across differently on ‘paper’ than it really was, and of course I use this blog as a sort of secondary therapy where I can rant and rave all I like with (mostly) anonymous impunity.  I can castigate C to the high heavens here; even though my annoyance at him can be real, it’s also somewhat tongue-in-cheek and in any case my feelings towards him vary from day to day, maybe even more frequently than that.  Stupid transference.

I’ve managed relatively well without him thus far.  I’ve not been in good form by any means, but when am I (except when hypomanic)?  My only real major episodes were last night and part of today, but there were precipitating causes – the McFs, perhaps unsurprisingly – and that’s a story for another day, for it is now 1.40am in the UK and I must draw myself away from the computer.  It’s my first night of the tri-weekly sleeper-fast and I need to try and relax somehow in a perhaps futile attempt to get some rest.  Due to the almost certain insomnia of the next week, I have a horrible feeling that the coming seven days will not be much fun, but we’ll see.


Bookmark and Share

Jul 242009
 

This week has sucked, and I am glad it is nearing its completion.  I’m actually in a fairly good mood now as I write this, but it’s the first day that I have actually felt that right from getting up.

As you will know from Monday’s post, I’d been in bad form regarding the fucked-up status of my relationship with the psychiatrist.  However, no sooner had I published that post than an email arrived from the Horse that put me in an even worse mood.  My first reaction was of panic, but it was shortly replaced by anger.

Prior to Monday, the latest in the work saga had been that Horse had asked me to yet again outline any “aggravating factors” that had occurred in the workplace prior to my absence.  I had already done this back in March, and received a reply that was nothing but an unconstructive and condescending refutation of my comments.  So, when this second request came, I had simply outlined a few management issues that needed to be addressed.

They have agreed to increased supervision in the immediate aftermath of any return to work, as well as a phased returned facilitated by payment commensurate with hours of work rather than by use of annual leave to cover the out of office hours.  Yet again, though, everything else was refuted.  Frankly, it seems to me that the Horse is actually too braindead to even understand what I was saying.  I would have given my boss, with whom the Horse seems to be working closely, more credit, but I think that this is her first experience of managing an absence of this length and as such she seems to be delegating most of the responsibility to Personnel.

Work have picked the wrong person to fuck with.  A’s job is writing employment law.  His brother, DI, is an CAB advisor.  His best friend, W, is involved at a senior level with a charity law unit in a well-regarded university (my employers are a charity).  My mother is a former Personnel Officer.  My best friend, D, is a Personnel journalist.  One of my Twitter friends and regular commentators here, bourach, is a union rep.  I know where the fuck I stand, and if I don’t, I can soon fucking find out.

In exploring the relevant legislation, A has commented that I would probably need to put up more of a fight in regards to what would be considered reasonable by the ‘reasonable man on the street’, especially under the Disability Discrimination Act, if I were seriously to take them on.  Initially, I had not wanted to fuck the office over so hadn’t bothered to argue with them.  However, the more I hear from the Horse, and the more my boss doesn’t bother to stand up for me, the less I care.  I know things are over now.  I will almost certainly not be returning.  It’s illegal for them to give me a shit reference on the grounds of my disability, and I will be seeking assurances from the fuckstains that this does not happen.  The point I’m making is that I no longer feel I have much to lose by fucking back with them.

To demonstrate that she speaks in Fuckwit rather than English, I am including a few excerpts from her email.  Except for my [] points, these extracts are exactly as they appeared in the email, though I have bolded the especially hilarious bits.  Sigh.  I thought they still taught grammar in schools?

SI, as explained in previous correspondence, a priority system would be introduced so that [managers] and [others]  to adhered too (however there may be exceptions to this)

As you can understand that we wish to cause least distribution to the team, we would appreciate if GP appointments were made at the start of the day as I am lead to believe that your GP is based in [some distance away].

[Re:my request that work was clearly delineated between my assistant an me] Unfortunately we can not adhered too at all time.

Well, no, you can’t ‘adhered to’, you stupid bitch.  Your contention that the organisation wishes to make ‘reasonable adjustments’ to accommodate my illness is frankly amusing given your continuous refutations of my comments.

Her constant use of my name at the beginning of sentences (if you could even call them that) is infuriating.  How dare she patronise me in this fashion?  How dare she?  I can almost guarantee that my intellect is about double hers.  I am also willing to bet substantially that my qualifications are more significant than hers.  Even if not, I think the pathetic construction of her correspondence just proves that she is a dumb, fuckwitted moron.  I would have thought that it was key in a Personnel job to be able to communicate effectively.  Apparently not in my organisation.  It doesn’t matter that my dismissal is imminent anymore, as I was wasted on the cockheads anyway, it seems.

She also demanded written evidence regarding Dr C.  She failed to specify the nature of the written evidence she requires.  I am now of the belief that they don’t believe I have seen her or that I have been diagnosed as I have.  A says this is paranoia and that it is standard practice to ask for written evidence for everything.  Maybe so, but they have not asked for anything of this nature previously.  In A’s view, this exemplifies the incompetence of the Personnel function in the organisation.  Which is probably fair in relation to some of its members, most notably the Horse.

Anyway, this email arrived on Monday, which was 20th July.  As per the Horse’s previous email a few weeks ago, I understood that I was due to attend Occupational Health the following day, ie. Tuesday 21st.  The Horse then said in the email referenced above that the appointment was on Thursday 23rd.  Great work, Horse.  You’re obviously competent enough to keep track of your own emails.  It turned out it was Tuesday, but I had to call OHS themselves to determine this.

I emailed her back and was frankly just on the borderline of civil.  Well, that’s not true; I am always very careful in my correspondence with them not to be a cunt, as they would indubitably use it against me, so it was still polite and professional.  However, there was a sneering, cynical tone to it that adequately if subtlety conveyed just how fucked off I am with the whole bloody thing.  AC told me it was a bit “cheeky” (but justifiably so); Mum and A said it wasn’t cheeky exactly, but it did make clear that I was sick of the way they were treating me.  Good.  That is what was intended.

It is the tip of the iceberg, anyway.  A and I are going to work on an email to the Horse outlining exactly why her shite contentions fail, and why what she perceives as “reasonable” is in actual fact not at all reasonable.  We are going to do this before she contacts me again to eliminate the risk of a knee-jerk emotional response to her inevitable imbecility, and it’s going to be fucking brilliant.

Anyhow, despite my anger, Monday evening / night was relatively OK.  Without the sleeping pill (it was my week off them until last night), I didn’t sleep, as ever, but I didn’t go mental either.

This was not the case on Tuesday afternoon.  I worked myself into a major panic regarding the impending OHS appointment, which culminated in some fun with a knife.  There are at least 10 random slashes across my arms, legs, breasts and stomach, not to mention the delightful words of “vile”, “fail” and “die” across my lower abdomen.  In keeping with previous incidences of self-harm, I then calmed down.  For a while anyway.

I was laughably early for the appointment, so sat in my car playing games on my phone for a while.  I was fine until I actually got into the building and then I just lost it.  I took a Valium, but to be honest by the time it started having any effect, I was out of there – not that one Valium tends to make any difference anyway.

I was, fairly quickly, approached by a tall, fairly good-looking middle-aged bloke with grey hair.  This exacerbated my panic as I was expecting the woman that I’d seen the last time I was at occupational health; at least I was familiar with her.

He introduced himself as the doctor I was to be seeing.  I could barely speak and when he held out his hand I could barely shake it.  I was shaking, stuttering, rocking back and forth and generally behaving like a loon.  I even burst into tears at one point, for which I then found myself apologising.

It was telling that the only notes the bloke actually took were regarding my current medications.  He literally wrote nothing else, as I recall – why would he bother?  It was self-evident that I am mad, why bother noting that information?  I don’t really remember a great deal of the conversation, but I do recall telling him that work didn’t believe me about the BPD / bipolar diagnosis and that they were out to get me.  I also recall him asking if I had been to university, and my telling him that I ended up having to leave my Masters degree with a post-graduate diploma because I had a previous breakdown at that point.  He said quietly, and with evident sincerity, that he was “sorry to hear that”.  In fact, he seemed so genuine and sympathetic in saying so, that I thought he was going to come around the desk and put his arms around me.  I also admitted to the self-harm, some of which I even showed him,and the recent hilarious mini-suicide attempt. I told him about the trouble with the shrinks that is causing such extreme fuckuppery at present.

I have to say he was lovely.  I felt that not only did he understand the nature of the diagnoses and the symptoms thereof, he actually seemed genuinely sorry that I was experiencing them and, reading between the lines (although he didn’t actually say so), I did get the impression that he wasn’t overly impressed with the behaviour office.

Although he was nice, the meeting was essentially a waste of my petrol.  I was there less than 10 minutes, with his view being very clear; there is no way I am well enough to return at the minute.  He didn’t put a timeframe on it the way his colleague had done the last time I was there, but did say he would probably see me again.

It’ll be interesting to see what Horse and friends make of what he says.

I was fine on Tuesday evening, but after going to bed I became progressively mental.  Well, I say ‘mental’, but that’s probably not true; it was more real, hard-core depression (is it the same thing?).

I admitted defeat.  Work had won.  Georgie had won.  V had won.  Maisie’s husband had won.  The school bullies had won.  My ex had won.  I had failed, epically.

I ceased to care.  Let C section me.  Let him not section me.  Let the shrinks abandon me.  Let them not abandon me.  Let me die, let me live, I don’t care.  I just didn’t care.  Whatever became of me, I didn’t give a fuck.  My life is over; all I can look forward to is existence.  If that’s my future, then it doesn’t matter what form it specifically takes.

A started babbling at me in his sleep, which is not something he can help, but it annoyed me and I started crying and came downstairs.  I lay on the sofa and curled up with the cats, rocking back and forth, and remaining there, awake, for the rest of the night.  I thought about adding to the body art, but to be honest I simply didn’t have the energy or motivation.  Interestingly, I have read in several places that depressed people are at the most risk of suicide and/or self-harm when they start to make small improvements, for instance when anti-depressants or psychotherapy first start to be successful; when they are in the depths of despair, they simply cannot get motivated to undertake the acts, but when they are still depressed, just a little less so, they begin to get back enough energy to go ahead and do it.

Wednesday was alright, if boring.  However, after I went to bed on Wednesday night, A found some of the cuts from Tuesday afternoon and was upset by them (I had been successful in hiding them until then).  I freaked out at him at one point then started crying and apologising to him.  I kept wailing that he was angry with me, and he would either not answer or he would say that he was not angry with “my rational mind”, which means he is angry with me because my irrational mind is in control of me so much of the time.

But he ended up being nice to me and so I got over it and, although I was fairly depressed yesterday during the day, I improved last night have been in fairly good form since.  Strange how the moods swing.

So, this is kind of a pointless post, but then they all are, except for my own reference, and of course that is the main point of this blog.  So I suppose in that sense it does have some point.


Bookmark and Share

Jul 202009
 

So, after my grovelling apology and new-found respect for Dr C back in June, the current behaviour of her and her team has reinforced to me why I thought they were shit in the first place.

I was supposed to be seeing Dr C next Tuesday, so as she could review how the change to Venlafaxine was affecting me.  Regular readers will know that I’ve gone completely fucking mental since I changed to them, as demonstrated in just about all my posts in the last few weeks, but especially here and here.  Dr C, or perhaps more accurately her bint secretary, had already changed my appointment time several times.  This was irritating, but meh; as long as they were to see me, I could live with it.

Well, a letter arrived on Friday from their office stating that whilst they “apologised for the inconvenience”, the outpatient clinic had been cancelled and that an appointment had been rearranged for 8 September.  September.  What the fucking fuck?

I went to ring them but instead of being able to type their number into my phone I just ended up panicking and ultimately throwing it across the room.  Eventually I got my mother to phone the bint secretary for me.

The bint told her that the clinic wouldn’t have even been with Dr C in the first place.  My mother didn’t get the name, but it sounded like it was Dr N, the SHO I met the first time I went to psychiatric outpatients.  That wouldn’t have been ideal, but I could have lived with it.  But anyway, Dr N has cancelled her clinic.  Just like that, apparently, and no more reason was given.

Alright, my ma went on.  But SI is climbing the walls and would really need to speak to Dr C.

But that isn’t possible, apparently, since Dr C is on holiday.  For “quite a while”.

And in the meantime?

September is literally the first appointment available, so that’s too bad really, oh how regrettable, but that’s the way it is.  If there are any cancellations, they’ll apparently phone me.  Yeah, right.

FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK

Go fuck yourselves, one and all in psychiatry on the NHS.  Fucking bastarding cuntflapped bollockheads.

No wonder I don’t want to be hospitalised, if this is the standard of care one can expect.  Mental health professionals don’t care about mentals, clearly.

I got off the phone with my ma and threw my head at the wall with such force that I literally fell backwards, and very nearly knocked myself out.  I sat down again, got back up, sat down, got up, paced, sat down, paced some more and eventually ended up in the kitchen looking for the knife.  I then went and re-carved the word ‘HATE’ across my tummy, about which I wrote here.

That action having been completed, I sat on the sofa with the knife for a while wailing and sobbing in utter desolation.  (For what it’s worth, after a fairly short while I felt a lot better, proving that self-harm does indeed work).

It’s like the conversation I had with C on Thursday.  I don’t think I’m being taken seriously by the NHS.  I really don’t.  I would love to have the nerve to make a suicidal gesture and that would fucking show them.  Even better, I’d love to actually be successful in catching the bus and then the cunts would face a potential lawsuit and be forced to apologise to my family and friends and shit.  But as of right now, obviously, I don’t have the nerve.

Everyone is commenting that these tablets don’t seem to be good for me.  As I detailed here, if they are creating mixed episodes (which they are), then the apparent way of treating this is to add mood stabilisers to the medication cocktail.

How the fuck am I meant to get these if the psychiatrist refuses to fucking see me for months?  My GP can, theoretically, prescribe them, but of course he’s not the expert that Dr C supposedly is.  She would know if the mixed episodes are caused directly by the Venlafaxine, or whether it’s something else.  She would know whether she should change me to another anti-depressant, or whether adding mood stabilisers on top of Venlafaxine would be the best answer.  I am not sure that Lovely GP has this in-depth knowledge.  As CVM (a registered nurse) said to me, he went to university for five years and then trained as a GP thereafter, so he damn well should be able to know – but, simply, he doesn’t have the same knowledge and specialist experience than Dr C and her ilk are reputed to have.  Still, I may go and see him anyway.

I am convinced that C could get them to take notice (it turned out that it was him rather than Lovely GP that did in the first place), but of course there is no C this week :-(   I will have to rant about it to him next week before he then goes away for two weeks :-( :-(

Additional worries:

  • Georgie is on this landmass.  In fact, she is – until her departure next week – never more than about 40 miles away.  I feel violated.  I wonder, despite my request for her not to, how much back-chat she has engaged in about me?
  • Fucking occupational health tomorrow :-(   Panic panic panic panic panic panic
  • Because of the shrinks wanking about, it is almost certain that I will lose my job now.  If they’d see me as planned next week then I might have been able to get a solution to my present situation fairly quickly.  Given that I am now likely to continue feeling this fucked up until at least September, about the time work are expecting me back, I really cannot see how the situation can be resolved.  I didn’t realistically think it could have been anyway, but it was possible, and now the chances of not getting dismissed are low to infinitesimal.
  • The effects of my mentalism on poor A (I went mental again on Saturday, though it was remarkably less severe than the previous couple of weeks).
  • The fact that some people are still unwilling to try and understand that this is not something that I can help, that I could end being mental by “changing my thoughts” (ha!), and decide to tell me what I should and shouldn’t do about it and how I should count my blessings.  Never thought of that or anything, thanks.

I’m not totally losing it today, but things do seem pointless and bleak.  Nevertheless, that’s a fairly default position for me, so I suppose it’s progress from going totally off my head.

Well, I will report back on the occupational health tomorrow.  Can’t wait…!


Bookmark and Share

Jul 162009
 

I told him everything. Everything I could think of. I told him about the hanging attempt, and the self-harm of the same weekend. I told him about the carving of ‘HATE’ onto my stomach. I told him about the delusions I’ve experienced lately. I told him how I almost obsessively read pro-suicide newsgroups on the internet which provide advice on how to do yourself in in the most fool-proof manners possible.

It was about as easy to talk about as discovering that the person you love used to fuck baby seals during hate-filled orgies would be to experience, but I did it.

After apologising to him for wasting his time last week, and the usual grilling that induced (“why do you feel you wasted my time? What was it you should have said or done that you didn’t? Why did you feel unable to express that?” blah blah), I told him that if I was honest and open with this stuff that he would section me.

“To clarify,” C began, “I can’t myself section you.”

Oh, really? I do know nothing about the Mental Health Act, after all. I haven’t clearly researched it or anything, C. I had no idea!

“I know, I know,” I interjected. “But as a mental health professional you can easily find two doctors that will do it for you.”

“If I believed that you were in imminent danger of harming or killing yourself, or others, I’d have to contact either your GP or psychiatrist, yes.”

I fidgeted relentlessly, eventually stating that whilst I would not say any danger was imminent, I could not guarantee that it wasn’t.

I don’t remember what he must have said, but I just went ahead and just told him the bloody lot. Not all at once, but one way or another, I did.

There isn’t a great deal of point in detailing the bits where I told him what happened, as it would be repeating a lot of the material about which I’ve already written and to which I have linked above. The only thing I think I haven’t expressly detailed here is my perusal of the pro-suicide newsgroups, but there’s not much to say on that. I read them. It’s interesting. I know how to kill myself should I want to. I find morbid fascination in the pursuit. The end.

He did ask what I felt the causes of the mentalisms were. I blamed Venlafaxine, stating that I understood that if it was taken in many people experiencing any bipolar symptoms, it could increase mixed episodes, and that although my main diagnosis is BPD, Dr C does believe I have bipolar II as well.

C asked me when I was seeing her again and advised that I would have to tell her about all of this (no shit, Sherlock), but said that that wasn’t really what he was getting at. Apparently he wanted to know were there any emotionally stressful events that brought the madness on.

Aside from my belief that I had bollocked A’s computer on Monday – after which I carved the ‘HATE’ into myself – there was none. I just went mad. I apologised to C for this.

C laughed, but in a nice way, and said that it was OK; I didn’t need to have a reason. He had just been keen to know if there was one.

He probed me on how I felt there and then as I sat in his office about the various episodes, and how I’d felt in their aftermaths. I thought carefully about this, then responded that in a way I was regretful of them, because A had to bear witness to them, or at least live in knowledge of them, and that I was unhappy about that.

“OK,” he said, “but how do you feel about it yourself?”

I responded that I was mostly indifferent because I deserve it all.

“You deserve it?!” he exclaimed. “Why?”

“What’s my point in this world? Whose lives do I enrich? What do I do? Everything I touch, everything with which I come into contact, turns to shit.”

“Do you think I’ve turned to shit?” he asked.

“Do you think I have contaminated your mind with mine?” I queried.

“Do you think I cannot cope with you?” he returned.

It was like a game of verbal tennis, and I don’t remember who the game-set-match went to. Probably him, to be honest. But it doesn’t matter because at this point some fuckwit knocked on his door. C apologised and got up to answer it.

Fuck. I was furious with him, briefly. I don’t care if your fucking children (if he has any) have had their throats slit and their eyes gouged out and shoved up their arses, C, this is my time with you. Anyhow, to be fair to him he tried to fob the person off, was apparently unsuccessful, and turned back to me saying he’d be back momentarily.

During his absence, which seemed like 10 minutes but was probably about 30 seconds in reality, I imagined all the bile-filled rants I was going to post about him both here and on Twitter. However, when he returned he explained that it was some old broad who got lost looking for the hearing clinic down the corridor, and needed help to locate it. C did her the courtesy of showing her to the place so, even though the interruption was annoying, I did think it was nice of him to help the old woman. So I softened and forgave him.

He returned to the verbal tennis subject, but I don’t really remember any more about it to be honest.

My next recollection is that he asked me what was so terrifying about the possibility of being sectioned.

“Oh God,” I cried, “that means you’re going to do it! You’re going to phone them! I won’t do it again, I promise!”

“I just want to know what you fear about it, that’s all,” he replied calmly. It was an interesting answer; he wasn’t saying that he was or he wasn’t going to do it (though he was evidently trying to infer the latter) – it was presumably deliberately ambiguous as some sort of get-out clause if he later did feel sectioning me was necessary.

In any event, I was reluctant to tell him that the reason I don’t want to be sectioned is because I would miss him. That’s about the only secret I kept from him today, because that’s just too pathetic to even articulate verbally. Instead, I told him that I knew the kind of shite that went on in psychiatric institutions and that I didn’t “fancy it.”

This is true. A and I ran into G, our intellectual philosophising friend about whom I wrote here (interestingly, my most popular post to date) the other day, and he was telling us that his ex, a bipolar sufferer, spent a while in a psychiatric unit and that if she was fucked up already, she left in a worse condition. Apparently they all but force you to engage in group therapy, and the differing types of transference bouncing about the room turn the whole thing into a complete fucking nightmare. This correlates with stuff I’ve read and accounts I’ve heard elsewhere. I could perhaps cope with hospitalisation if I didn’t have to engage in this way with the other mentals, I think, but if I did have to do any of this arse, I am convinced I would be even more fucking crazy than when I was admitted.

The crux of this discussion was that whilst he accepts that I am largely terrified of being sectioned, he thinks a part of me would actually welcome a recommendation of hospitalisation, because that would be a recognition of just how indescribably fucking awful I am feeling at times. This was interesting, as it basically echoes a view that A holds. He continued that whilst I obviously didn’t want him to instigate any Mental Health Act shite, and would be very angry with him if he did, part of me would also feel that he cared about me if he did so. He then went on to say that perhaps in some ways the self-harm is about proving how terrible I feel, regardless of how much I try and hide it, as I don’t have adequate words for a description of the mentalism. He said that he believed that part of me didn’t feel the enormity of my psychological condition was being taken seriously.

It’s all true. It’s all fucking true. How does he know? How? How?! He fucking is Derren Brown, even if he looks less like him since shaving off his goatee beard (I’m sure at this juncture someone may think, “ah yes – Derren Brown. He’s a mentalist in the true sense of the word and you’re not, SI.” Well – I know this. But nevertheless, I think ‘mentalism’ works for us nutjobs too. So fuck that shit.).

Anyway, there is more to self-harming than just what he said, but it’s probably part of it. The rest of it is absolutely spot-on. I don’t like admitting it, but it’s true.

How. Does. He. Know.

He’d picked up on the fact that I’d said, “I won’t do it again,” which was apparently just said in panic and didn’t come across as remotely sincere. He postulated the position that part of me saw him as some sort of authority figure; in fact, he said, it was as if I was a child trying to satisfy her parent(s).

This resonated with me. I concluded towards the end of this post, reluctantly, that perhaps I do parentify C. I asked him if he felt that I did that.

He sort of shook his head, then told me that the therapeutic dynamic can be reflective of many of my outside relationships, not just those with parents. I don’t remember exactly what he said, but essentially the idea was that my transference towards him reflects, or at least can reflect, all my interpersonal relationships, whether current or past. He did, however, state something to the effect that perhaps my childhood had a stronger bearing on the transference than the here and now does, though again I don’t remember how it was phrased exactly.

He asked how I felt about people in general. I said I wished that they’d all go away and leave me alone. C nodded, though I saw his eyebrow quiver slightly cynically. I added, “but of course I don’t want them to leave me alone.”

He laughed slightly, and nodded more convincingly this time. “You hate the world but you fear it, in your words, abandoning you,” he said. Basically, yes.

I believe it was at this point that the silence returned. I turned round and looked at the clock and saw, to my surprise, that 10 minutes remained of the session. Once more I apologised for wasting his time and said that I hated sitting in silence, as it was a waste of his time and not helpful to me either. C went to challenge this, I think, but then I butted in and said, “where do we go from here?”

He asked what I meant, and I explained that I was aware that our contracted sessions were due to end. What happened next, therefore?

“How do you feel…?” he began

“No,” I said. “I’m going to bat that back at you.”

“How so?”

“How do you feel about it?”

To my amazement, he actually answered the question; in fact, he monologued for some time in response. The essence of what he was saying is that any termination of therapy has to be conducted over time and be mutually agreed; it will never just come to an end some week. Was that OK with me?

“Of course,” I said flatly. “But I am ever conscious of you telling me once that as this therapy is on the NHS, it will be finite. Just how finite is finite?”

He laughed. “It’s a good question,” he said.

I pointed out that I was aware that a borderline personality can be difficult and time-consuming to treat, but I accepted that what was right for Person A was not necessarily right for Person B.

“Exactly,” he said. “It’s difficult to say, I’m afraid – I’m sorry I can’t be more definite than that.” He said that we will discuss in the next session the exact time-frame for which we want the next contract to last, though the next contract isn’t necessarily the last anyway, presumably. Or at least hopefully.

“OK,” I responded.

“But how do you feel about that?” he pressed. He should get that printed on his fucking business cards.

It was at this point that I turned into a gibbering wreck, and I fought against it…but he knew. Eventually I gave in and just blubbed like a fucking baby in front of him.

Through my tears I explained that I was, naturally, reassured by the fact that the therapy was to continue, as I was perpetually terrified of him abandoning me. He nodded in acceptance, but recognised there was some sort of ‘but’ coming. The ‘but’ is that I am simultaneously frightened of the therapy continuing.

“Frightened?” he remarked, surprised.

“Yes,” I wailed. “This is so hard. So hard. I always expected I’d have to get worse before I got better, cos I have to confront stuff I’ve been repressing for years, but I didn’t expect that it would be this difficult. It’s so intense.”

He paused for a minute or two, then asked if I had gotten worse since I met him. I tried to bullshit about the medication having an adverse effect on me and not him, but the reality is that yes, my condition has been aggravated quite demonstrably by psychotherapy. I think I apologised to him and said that it was not him – it was nothing personal – it was me and my reaction and repression and defences.

When I finally raised my head I could see that he was upset. He wasn’t crying or anything, but there was something about his facial expression that was horribly sad and dismayed. I don’t think he felt that I was insulting him or anything; I think he was just kind of taken aback by my unusual candour and concerned that I felt everything was so utterly bleak at present that part of me didn’t want to see a future for myself, either in or outside therapy.

He said, “I want this to be a safe place for you to talk about everything. I don’t want you to feel you have to repress anything because you think I am going to panic and get straight on the phone to your GP…” At this point, he acted out making a phone call to LGP, and I accused him of over-dramatising.

“OK, I am a bit,” he admitted, apologetically. “But I don’t want you to think I’m going to panic and do that, I’m not…”

“Thank you,” I interrupted in a pathetically grateful whisper.

“…however,” he continued, “I don’t want you to think I don’t care. If you are feeling suicidal, please phone your GP at once.”

“What if it happens at night?” I asked. “My GP is married with three young children.”

“Then you take yourself to casualty.”

“But what if I don’t have the mental faculties to be able to do that?”

“That’s my advice to you,” he said authoritatively. “Take. Yourself. To. Casualty. OK?”

“OK,” I agreed.

And then, once again, it was over.

It is two weeks until I see him again; after that next session, he will then be on leave for a fortnight. Part of me welcomes the break, for the process is exhausting, demanding, hurtful and intense as fuck. But overall I am dreading it. I rely on him so much. He is the only person I can begin to openly talk to, and I mean that in no offensive way to anyone. It just is.

I had asked him before about what would happen if I go mental whilst he is off, and he said we could discuss that. I’ll be sure to bring it up in a fortnight’s time, because nothing is surer to cause me to go batshit mad again than being parted from him for three weeks.

It’s feeble and lamentable beyond measure that he and his imminent absences elicit this reaction in me, but I will try and end on a more positive note by remembering that this is temporary in nature. So is the therapy itself, but it is in no imminent danger of drawing to a close, and I still find myself a free, non-sectioned woman tonight, and this morning I really wondered if that would be the case. Ho hum.


Bookmark and Share