| (Kind of) Discussing Child Sex Abuse with C – Week 43 | Latest Letter to the Trust, With a Giant Helping of ‘Screw You!’ |
I saw my consultant psychiatrist, NewVCB, for the second time this morning, an appointment that I’d been dreading for days. Even though my first encounter with her back in January had gone without any significant hitch, and even though I had established on that occasion that she was not as formidably intimidating as OldVCB, I still found myself feeling scared of her in the run-up to today. She’d been ostensibly much nicer than her predecessor, but there had been moments where I’d found her a little condescending, and anyway I think I’ve just developed a fear of psychiatrists anyway. Don’t ask me why.
I was fully expecting that NewVCB would keep me waiting for 23 light years before she emerged to escort me to my for-today fate, but to my astonishment she actually came to get me shortly before the appointed time. That was quite impressive; OldVCB was never on time, never mind early. I was also pleased to note that my file seemed to have been fully updated to reflect my name change.
She showed me into her office as usual and gestured for me to sit opposite her, before quite amicably asking me how things had been. I was honest and told her that Quetiapine has, in general, made my life better. I said that I had come from a point of being severely depressed when I first met her to being, now, perhaps only moderately so. I said that whilst not perfect, this was clearly a significant improvement. I also said that there probably wasn’t the same mad variation in my moods that there had been around Christmas and the months surrounding it.
She agreed that this was encouraging, but said she was also wondering about the status of the voices. I said that Quetiapine had not completely eliminated them, which it hasn’t, but that they were (a) less frequently in evidence and (b) much less overwhelming. I pointed out, with some regret, that the benevolent one (Tom) has disappeared entirely (though admittedly Olanzapine, my previous anti-psychotic, seemed to have been his murderer).
NewVCB asked me to describe the status of ‘They‘ relative to the unfortunate incident on Christmas Day, the details of which she was aware from our previous meeting. I said that a comparison was impossible because the horror and overwhelming nature of that particular incident was almost unique. “They have tried to get me to kill myself before,” I told her, “but since on most of those occasions suicide has been in the forefront of my mind anyway, those occasions did not seem so serious. Christmas did, but they don’t have that hold over me at the minute.”
She nodded, apparently encouraged, and we discussed a bit more about the frequency of the hallucinations (no set pattern, but perhaps once a week on average) and how I can now…not ignore them, but tolerate the levels of their malevolence.
“Regarding Christmas,” I started, uncertainly. “The baby involved, doing you remember me telling you about him?”
She responded in the affirmative.
“His baby brother was born yesterday. They’re naming him after my child abuser.”
NewVCB was visibly horrified by this information. She gasped, threw her hand over her mouth and winced.
“Oh, Pandora,” she sort of sighed, through gritted teeth, shaking her head rather despairingly. “That must be dreadful…”
I nodded. “It’s not the parents’ fault; they don’t know about the abuse. And of course it’s not the baby’s fault. But I feel irrationally angry all the same, as well as…not hurt, it’s deeper than that. I’m horrified to the pit of my stomach.”
We discussed the fact that I have been covering really difficult material with C recently, though at this stage I didn’t specifically tell her that it was in relation to Paedo. I said that although it was hard stuff, I nevertheless thought it was productive work, and the fact that I hadn’t completely lost my marbles as a result of it was a testament to the wonder of Quetiapine.
We moved back to talking about ithe drug, in particular with reference to the dosage. For now, NewVCB wants to keep me on 300mg, as – according to her – that’s presently thought to be the most effective dose for those presenting with mainly depressive symptoms.
She said, “doses above 700mg or thereabouts tend, according to the recent research, to be most effective for schizophrenia or full-blown mania – and you don’t have either of those. So for now I want you to remain at the present dose. How do you feel about that?”
“That’s grand. I suppose my thinking had been to maybe increase it in the long-run, but I’m happy enough to maintain the status quo for now.”
“In all probability we will have to increase it as time goes on,” she admitted. “600mg is a future possibility, though as I said I’d be dubious about raising it much higher than that. For now, though, I want to monitor just how much this dose helps you over a sustained period, rather than just a few months. Thereafter, if you still feel that your depression is within the ‘moderate’ zone or the voices are still there, then yes, we can think about an increase.
“At the end of the day,” she continued, “the most important aspect of your treatment is psychological. All medication will ever do is take the edge of your distress until you’ve worked through things psychologically. Traumas, depression, whatever – certainly, they do change the physiology of the brain, and we can deal with that from within the medical model. But it’s only one part of treatment in a case like yours.”
Of course, I was very well aware of that, but I didn’t press it. Her point was valid: leave the Quetiapine as it is until it has had several months to work its magic, just as she had planned from my introduction to the drug in January. (Interestingly, and gratifyingly from my point of view, she didn’t mention Venlafaxine at all. In the previous meeting she’d expressed the desire to wean me off it, which I don’t want her to do. I admit that my reluctance is partly to do with the horrendous potential discontinuation syndrome, but it’s mainly because the current cocktail is making a difference, and I don’t want to interfere with that).
We discussed concentration and focus, and I said that it was still abominable. “I pick up a book and find myself reading the same sentence 20 different times,” I told her, “which is incredibly frustrating, as I’ve always loved reading and have a thirst for knowledge.”
New VCB asked me to describe a typical day.
“I get up late, go to the sofa, watch TV. I don’t make food beyond Pot Noodles. I just sit there. And I hate that, because I’m actually quite an intelligent person who is capable of so much more.”
She nodded in agreement (yay) and said that she did honestly understand my frustrations, but that concentration was one of the last things to return in the ‘recovery process’, so I therefore shouldn’t feel too discouraged.
She suggested that I make a pact with A to once a day do something other than sit in the living room – a walk, a coffee, whatever. “It’s easier to be motivated when someone else is doing it with you,” she said. “And if you start doing something like that in the evenings with your partner, after a while you can start setting yourself small goals to do such things yourself during the day.”
Eventually she asked if there was anything else I wanted to discuss with her, and I said I had read up on and discussed PTSD with a number of others, with many thinking the diagnosis was more apt for me than BPD.
She asked why I felt that my symptomatology was consistent with that diagnosis so I told her about what happened with C last week, then gave her a brief run-down of the other symptoms, a la the other day’s BPD v C-PTSD post. However, I purposely refrained from mentioning complex-PTSD in order to see if she would bring it up unsolicited.
She did not disappoint. She said, “well, PTSD tends to be most applicable after a single traumatic event – an earthquake, a bombing, those sorts of things. When there is repeated trauma, things become more complicated, and we call that complex-PTSD. I think it actually goes without saying that you have C-PTSD – how could you not after the traumas you’ve gone through?”
I felt smugly pleased at the success of my latest self-diagnosis (the original, in which I correctly diagnosed myself with BPD and bipolar disorder, is here).
“Having said that,” NewVCB went on, “your case is not a simple one. You’re not really classically borderline. You’re not classically bipolar. You aren’t entirely a classical example of C-PTSD, and your psychotic features don’t classically fit any specific psychotic disorder. I could diagnose you with this, with that, with the other – but you’re a mix of all of these things. They all apply, but in a convoluted mishmash.”
I said that I understood and agreed with that, but I had – in part at least – been seeking recognition of C-PTSD as unlike borderline, it emphasised trauma, thus contesting my default “it was all my fault” position.
“It is helps you to deal with things, then yes absolutely, that’s great. You can’t not have it anyway, at least to some extent,” she said.
She remarked that I’d mentioned experiencing flashbacks in session with C and asked me how things had been with him, noting that last time she’d seen me I was very concerned about the cessation of psychotherapy.
“Well, I still am,” I confessed, “but we’ve agreed to sort of put discussion of that on hold for now and tackle this sex abuse stuff, which I think is important. I think the key thing to report is that, although this material is difficult and triggering, C and I are working very well together at the minute.”
“Good,” she said, again pointing out that limited as it may be, psychotherapy is still the crux of my treatment. “And I think that hits on an important point. I feel that your prognosis is quite encouraging, because (a) you’re bright, and your ability towards insight and your hunger to learn about your conditions make a huge difference and (b) you can work psychologically. Not everyone has even one of those, never mind both. Having said all that, you’re not ‘uncommon’ either, in the sense that you cross diagnostic criteria, so please be reassured by that.”
I’m not particularly, as I quite like being unique. Nevertheless, I suppose I should be glad that my prognosis is apparently quite positive. Since I don’t believe in cures I’m dubious, but I suppose a prognosis suggestive of an ability to manage my mentalness is quite a good thing.
As I left, she said that she did actually notice a change in me from the last time she’d seen me, echoing A’s sentiments on my recent mood. I don’t for half a second expect it to continue indefinitely, but it’s nice not to have to fight the urge to throw myself under a bus at every single opportunity. Let’s just see how much upcoming therapy sessions will conspire against me in that regard.
(PS. No ‘Article of the Week’ this week, for which my apologies. I simply haven’t come across much that I found worth sharing. Normal service will hopefully be resumed next week).
Related posts:






Follow Follow Tweet Tweet 







Well doesn’t that sound grand overall. This pretty much makes us smile. Cptsd, we knew it. But it is good to be affirmed. Right? Read Judith Herman. xx
Thanks Splint
Going to read Herman tonight and discuss it with C tomorrow. I’m very relieved that NewVCB was so accommodating.
Take care, hugs xxx
Glad that it went “well” and you came away validated, that’s the most important bit in my eyes. I read your post about C-PTSD too, very interesting that it’s so widely recognised, and yet not included in either of the Psycho-Bibles of Psychobollocks. I wonder why that is, when so many other considerably more wishy washy diagnonsenses are?
Lola x
Apparently it’s something to do with the fact that anyone who meets the criteria for C-PTSD also meets the criteria for non-complex PTSD. I see what they’re getting at, but as far as I can see from the different criteria, they’re different in many ways. I’m playing the armchair psychologist here, but I’d imagine that prolonged or sustained trauma would effect someone quite differently. I think that’s why Judith Herman felt the “complex” qualifier and a new set of diagnostic criteria were required.
Hugs x
Totally agree with that. It just makes sense. x
Wow, that seemed to go well, I’m glad she actually listened to you and it went well. As usual, great post, v.informative.
x
Bless you Lost, thanks. My exposure to psychiatrists is fairly limited (I only started seeing one last May) so it’ll take a while to get used to her not being a bitch, but at least she’s trying
Hugs xxx
I can see why you would be scared for an appointment even though it’s the second appt with this consultant. My current ward psychiatrist is quite good too but I am scared as hell when I need to consult him. I am glad the appt went well after all and the psychiatrist listened to you.
Thanks Astrid, I’m glad someone else understands the fear of them! Maybe it’s the power – they can put you on drugs, put you on the ward, diagnose you with whatever suits them. I’m glad that in both our cases though they have turned out to be quite good doctors
x
New VCB definitely sounds an improvement. It sounds like she listened to you and wasn’t too patronising, which to be honest is fairly unusual for psychs – they tend to excel in being patronising. xxx
Oh tell me about it. I grew to hate OldVCB less as time went on, mainly because she grew to realise that I was very well informed and self-aware. She seems to have conveyed that information in detail to her successor, cos she seems sensible enough to try.
I remember the psychiatrist I saw with the crisis team in August 2008. I still have vivid fantasies about burning her face off
Take care hun xxx
I’m glad NewVCB seems to have her head screwed on in a relatively sensible fashion. I know the difference it made when I got my current psychiatrist and he actually treated me like a human being, It’s sort of amazing how much it changes things.
I’m also glad they’re not fucking about with your meds again – it’s good to be given a period of stability.
Take care xxx
I know they’re generally bastards, but that twat you got before Dr O possibly represents one of the worst NHS mental health tales I’ve ever heard, and I’ve heard a lot. What a cunt. I’m glad that Dr O is so nice.
I’m not convinced I’d get on with NewVCB outside the psychiatrist-patient relationship, but it obviously doesn’t matter. As long as she treats me with respect and medicates me as required I’m down with that.
I agree that a period of stability is welcomed. In the long-term, I’d probably like to increase the Quetiapine dosage, but as I said to her, I’m happy enough for now.
I’m sorry things are so unbearably awful at the minute for you – i feel bad that I’m feeling a little better. You deserve better than what you’re getting at the minute
Hugs hun xxx
Just wanted to say I’m really pleased for you that this appt seemed to go better than expected, it’s always nice when that happens and you can walk away from it feeling as though you have been listened too. Also, I can understand the importance of having your traumas recognised, and having the c-ptsd confirmed by her. I have a neither good nor bad relationship with my psychiatrist but he is the only one that covers the middle-of-nowhere area that I live in so I have no choice to get on with him! Thankfully my social worker (MHO) is extremely good and as she works very closely with both him and the rest of the CMHT it makes things much better. Anyways, lets hope she proves to be much better than old VCB in the long run. Hugs x
I’m so glad that you have a good relationship with your social worker and at least an acceptable one with your psychiatrist; however, once again I find myself enraged on your behalf at the pathetic lack of resources in your area. I know you’re in a rural setting, but that doesn’t mean there are no mental health concerns in your community. Bastards. I know we depend on it, but sometimes I really hate the NHS
Hugs to you hun xxx